Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:775Hits:19978561Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188775
Title ProperConsociationalism in Lebanon after the Cedar Revolution
Other Title InformationExternal Threats, Political Instability, and Macrosecuritizations
LanguageENG
AuthorDinu, Elisabeta-Cristina
Summary / Abstract (Note)The literature on consociationalism posits external threats increase elite cooperation and political stability in consociational systems, provided that the threat is perceived as common by all political segments. Lebanon—a prominent consociational case—invites further reflection on this proposition, as international crises and even war did not increase cooperation between political parties. To further explore the relationship between external threats and political stability, the paper proposes a critical security approach, based on the Copenhagen School of security. The study investigates how political elites construct foreign threats relying on media analysis complemented by personal elite and expert interviews, as well as secondary sources. The study finds that despite political elites’ commitment to system maintenance, external threats decrease political stability in Lebanon because political segments are part of competing macrosecuritizations.
`In' analytical NoteNationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol. 28, No.3; Jul-Sep 2022: p.290-312
Journal SourceNationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol: 28 No 3
Key WordsLebanon ;  Political Instability ;  External Threats ;  Consociationalism in Lebanon ;  Macrosecuritizations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text