Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:366Hits:19947548Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188827
Title ProperInstitutional Design, Information Transmission, and Public Opinion: Making the Case for Trade
LanguageENG
AuthorBrutger, Ryan ;  Li, Siyao
Summary / Abstract (Note)Domestic debates about trade have increased the salience of international economic cooperation among the public, raising the question of whether, and how, domestic support can be rallied in support of international trade agreements. We argue that institutional features of trade agreements provide important cues to domestic audiences that shape support, particularly the membership composition and voting rules for multilateral deals. We use two survey experiments to show that the US public is more supportive of trade when it is negotiated with like-minded countries. We also find that the voting rules shape support for trade agreements, but differently across partisan audiences. Republican voters strongly favor the home country having veto power, whereas Democrats prefer agreements with equal voting rules. These differences are largely driven by perceptions of the agreement’s benefit for the nation and the public’s trust of the negotiators and perceived fairness of the rules.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 66, No.10; Nov 2022: p.1881-1907
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 66 No 10
Key WordsPublic Opinion ;  International Cooperation ;  Trade ;  International Institutions ;  Domestic Politics ;  Institutional Design


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text