| ID | 188882 |
| Title Proper | Co-Optation at the Creation |
| Other Title Information | Leaders, Elite Consensus, and Postwar International Order |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Carson, Austin ; Conklin, Matthew J |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article analyzes how democratic leaders cultivate an elite consensus in favor of participating in international institutions. We theorize two tactics to prevent elite dissent. Delegating early policy development to technocratic and nonpartisan experts can set a depoliticized tone. Later integration of opposition elites into the process can create powerful advocates that expand support to a consensus. We assess contrasting fates of the United Nations (UN) and International Trade Organization (ITO). Haunted by Woodrow Wilson’s failure to win approval for the League of Nations, leaders outsourced early planning for a UN to the Council on Foreign Relations. Later, Franklin D. Roosevelt and top aides tapped moderate Republicans for the US delegation to San Francisco, creating powerful Republican advocates. In contrast, leaders developed the ITO in-house and excluded legislative elites in final negotiations, provoking elite dissent. These tactics shed new light on leaders, elites, and the domestic politics of international order and hegemony. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 31, No.4; Aug-Sep 2022 : p.634-666 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 31 No 4 |
| Key Words | Postwar International Order |