| ID | 188893 |
| Title Proper | Symbolic Amplification and Suboptimal Weapons Procurement |
| Other Title Information | Explaining Turkey’s S-400 Program |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hintz, Lisel ; Banks, David E |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Turkey’s 2019 acquisition of Russian S-400 missile batteries is puzzling. Despite repeated threats of sanctions by the United States, North Atlantic Treaty Organization ally Turkey purchased a multi-billion-dollar Russian air defense system that remains nonoperational, fails to cover Turkey’s air defense gap, and led to Turkey’s costly expulsion from the F-35 program. We argue unexpected domestic constraints created by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP)’s symbolic diplomacy raised the political costs of backing away from the deal. Collecting data from media reports and interviews, we analyze how Turkey’s AKP wielded the S-400 as a weapons system legitimating an identity narrative of Turkey as regional counterhegemon, facilitating the cultivation of coalitions with multiple, often competing, constituencies. We demonstrate via process tracing how the inherent ambiguity of symbols allowed nationalist constituencies key to the AKP’s hold on power to amplify the S-400 as symbolic of Turkey’s sovereignty, trapping Turkish officials in a costly policy corner. In unpacking Turkey’s S-400 purchase, the article contributes to the literature on symbolic diplomacy, audience costs, weapons procurement, and deterrence failure. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 31, No.5; Oct-Dec 2022 : p.826-856 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 31 No 5 |
| Key Words | Suboptimal Weapons Procurement ; Turkey’s S-400 Program |