| ID | 189046 |
| Title Proper | Explaining Activity in Authoritarian Assemblies |
| Other Title Information | evidence from China |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Felix Wiebrecht ; Wiebrecht, Felix |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Who attempts to influence policymaking through authoritarian assemblies and why are some delegates considerably more active in doing so than others? Drawing on original data from provincial People's Political Consultative Conferences (PPCCs) in China, this study adopts a delegate-centered perspective and develops a theory of delegates’ activity in authoritarian assemblies. It argues that delegates’ activity can be explained by a combination of both cooptation theory and an understanding of delegates’ position within the authoritarian regime and hierarchy. The results highlight that core elites with more direct means of influencing policymaking will forego assemblies. Yet, peripheral elites lack other institutional channels of access to decision-makers and have to voice their demands in authoritarian legislatures. This study highlights the need for disaggregating groups of actors in authoritarian politics and offers an alternative view of cooptation particularly relevant for closed authoritarian regimes. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol. 22, No.3; Nov 2022: p. 435 - 455 |
| Journal Source | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol: 22 No 3 |
| Key Words | Authoritarianism ; Institutions ; China ; Legislature ; Cooptation |