| ID | 189251 |
| Title Proper | (Re)producing the ‘history problem |
| Other Title Information | memory, identity and the Japan-South Korea trade dispute |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Deacon, Chris |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Japan-South Korea relations have consistently been presented by International Relations scholars as a puzzle that confounds mainstream rationalist theories, which struggle to explain the consistent acrimony associated with the so-called ‘history problem’. While many scholars have, therefore, adopted conventional constructivist approaches to incorporate history into their analyses, such literature often neglects the processes of (re)construction of this social reality, thereby implicitly treating these negative sentiments as essentialised elements of Korean and Japanese culture/identity which cause certain foreign policies. Using the recent Japan-South Korea trade dispute as a case study, this article instead draws on critical constructivist/poststructuralist theory and discourse analytical methods to examine how the ‘history problem’ is produced and reproduced. It argues that dominant discourses of remembering in South Korea, which represent Japan as an unrepentant colonial aggressor, and of forgetting in Japan, which represent South Korea as emotional and irrational for dwelling on the past, act to (re)produce identities that clash in their attitudes to difficult history. While such foreign policy practices (re)produce dominant national identities, these identities also shape the bounds of which foreign policies are legitimate or imaginable. This mutually constitutive relationship between identity and foreign policy continually reproduces the ‘history problem’ in Japan-South Korea relations. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 35, No.5; Sep 2022: p.789-820 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 35 No 5 |
| Key Words | Japan ; South Korea ; Identity ; Memory ; Discourse ; History Problem |