Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:480Hits:19923022Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID190407
Title ProperJudicializing Environmental Politics? China's Procurator-led Public Interest Litigation against the Government
LanguageENG
AuthorXia, Ying ;  Wang, Yueduan ;  Yueduan Wang
Summary / Abstract (Note)Scholars consider deficient local accountability mechanisms a key shortcoming of China's response to environmental issues. Through empirical analysis of the new procurator-led public interest litigation (PIL) system, this study examines whether – and to what extent – this shortcoming can be remedied by empowering the juridical institutions. It concludes that thanks to the procuratorates’ political insider status, relative autonomy from local politics and extensive resources, procurators have generally found ways to maintain a delicate balance between holding executive agencies environmentally accountable and managing local governments’ resistance to the PIL system. However, reliance on top-down political support may ultimately hinder the expansion and stability of the procuratorial PIL system.
`In' analytical NoteChina Quarterly , No.253; Mar 2023: p.90 - 106
Journal SourceChina Quarterly No 253
Key WordsPublic Interest Litigation ;  Judicialization ;  procuratorate ;  centre–local relations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text