| ID | 190654 |
| Title Proper | Bolstering middle power standing |
| Other Title Information | South Korea's response to U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy from Trump to Biden |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Huynh, Tam-Sang |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | South Korea's reluctant response to the U.S. Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) strategy so far has failed to send a clear-cut signal to regional countries. Despite upholding multilateralism as the cornerstone of its middle power diplomacy, South Korea has not worked in line with Indo-Pacific second-size powers given Seoul's relatively vague response to the Indo-Pacific structure. With foreign policy shifts from Trump to Biden, South Korea may be well-positioned to communicate its policies with a more nuanced response to the Indo-Pacific. To leverage Seoul's middle power standing and its commitment to multilateralism, the Moon Jae-in administration can be expected to reflect on clearer definitions of what 'Indo-Pacific' means and come up with a more comprehensive understanding of multilateral cooperation in the region so as not to mistake 'Indo-Pacific' for its security connotation. As for South Korea, pursuing a three-headed strategy, for example, continuing to position itself in the Indo-Pacific region as a balancer, enhancing ties with like-minded middle powers, and deepening the South Korea-ASEAN relationship, could accommodate Seoul's interests and concerns amid the U.S.–China strategic competition and the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 36, No.1; Jan 2023: p.32-60 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 36 No 1 |
| Key Words | Multilateralism ; South Korea ; Middle Power ; COVID - 19 ; US Indo-Pacific Strategy |