Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:647Hits:20373434Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID190756
Title ProperMeddling American voter? how norms, interests, and great power rivalries affect U.S. public support for partisan electoral interventions abroad
LanguageENG
AuthorMusgrave, Paul ;  Levin, Dov H
Summary / Abstract (Note)Foreign electoral interventions have attracted greater attention since the Russian intervention in the 2016 U.S. elections. Even though the United States has a long history of intervening in other countries’ elections, evidence about what drives public support for U.S. foreign electoral intervention is scarce. This paper uses a new set of surveys and experiments to test hypotheses about what drives the American public’s views of U.S. electoral interventions abroad. We find that there is no taboo against such U.S. interference in the American public. However, public support for U.S. election interference is not automatic. Respondents do not support interventions solely to advance U.S. interests or to protect democracy, although they prove more supportive of interventions on behalf of democratic parties that also favor U.S. interests or to protect longstanding democracies. Finally, support for an intervention rises when it is framed as responding to the actions of a great-power rival such as Russia.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 67, No.5; May 2023: p.828–857
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 67 No 5
Key WordsIntervention ;  Public Opinion ;  Foreign Policy ;  Foreign Electoral Intervention ;  Partisan Electoral Intervention


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text