| ID | 190914 |
| Title Proper | Hybrid warfare |
| Other Title Information | the continuation of ambiguity by other means |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Mumford, Andrew ; Carlucci, Pascal |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article presents the study of ambiguity as the essence of hybrid warfare to reconcile it with the international political context. It addresses the gaps in the literature in an effort to elucidate the essence of hybrid warfare not as a separate concept, but rather as the symptom of a changing political environment. The analysis of the literature is reinforced by two case studies: the war in eastern Ukraine of 2014 and the South China Sea dispute. Both these case studies express ambiguity in the combination of kinetic and non-kinetic means used to achieve political objectives. The article rests on three pillars that constitute the architecture of the central argument. The first pillar will address the gap in the current literature on hybrid warfare and how the current debate is too concerned with conflict dynamics rather than its political nature. The second pillar will delineate the essence, characteristics, and value of ambiguity in hybrid warfare. The third pillar will address the practice of hybrid warfare as the conduct of war by great powers. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Journal of International Security Vol. 8, No.2; May 2023: p.192 - 206 |
| Journal Source | European Journal of International Security Vol: 8 No 2 |
| Key Words | South China Sea ; Ukraine ; Ambiguity ; Hybrid Warfare ; Strategy |