| ID | 191600 |
| Title Proper | Belligerent Bear |
| Other Title Information | Russia, Status Orders, and War |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Røren, Pål |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Do states get higher social status from fighting? The prestige of war depends on the type of “status order” that it is interpreted in. Status orders condition and enable the pursuit and recognition of status within social clubs of world politics. Depending on the status order, social clubs may either value or stigmatize belligerence. An analysis comparing the status recognition that Russia received in three social clubs (the great power club, the G-8, and the UN Security Council) after it annexed Crimea and invaded eastern Ukraine in 2014 explores this assumption. The analysis shows that war generated different status effects on Russia's status within each of these clubs. Contrary to popular belief, and amid widespread condemnation, Russia was increasingly recognized as a great power within U.S. public discourse. In contrast, Russia's belligerence diminished its status within the G-8 and had little effect on its status in the UN Security Council. The findings underline the importance of context in estimating status effects of participating in wars and any other behavior that might impact a state's standing in world politics. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Security Vol. 47, No.4; Spring 2023: p.7–49 |
| Journal Source | International Security Vol: 47 No 4 |
| Key Words | War ; Russia ; Belligerent Bear ; Status Orders |