| ID | 191733 |
| Title Proper | Constructivist memory politics |
| Other Title Information | Armenian genocide recognition in Latvia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Fittante, Daniel |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Scholars have done a great deal to unpack the motivations sitting behind nationalists’ appropriation of Holocaust-related memory laws in several eastern European and Baltic states. While these accounts have shed important light on memory politics, there remains much scope for further study. For example, several Eastern European and Baltic states have passed resolutions recognizing the Armenian genocide, as well. Furthermore, the existing literature does not provide any analytical tools to conceptualize the dynamic and complex processes giving rise to memory laws. This article broadens the memory laws scholarship through an original analysis of Latvia's Armenian genocide recognition resolution of 2021. The findings highlight how diverse actors support and pass memory laws through a process of constructivist memory politics. Constructivist memory politics involves the strategies political actors employ to change the salience or meaning of historical events in the creation and promotion of memory laws. Although the analysis focuses on a single case, it provides the analytical tools to reorient how scholars approach memory laws both in Europe and elsewhere. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 99, No.2; Mar 2023: p. 805–824
|
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 99 No 2 |
| Key Words | Latvia ; Constructivist Memory Politics ; Armenian Genocide Recognition |