Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:772Hits:20004911Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID191965
Title ProperAuthoritarian Legacies and Partisan Bias in Corruption Voting
LanguageENG
AuthorKim-Leffingwell, Sanghoon
Summary / Abstract (Note)What explains the lack of electoral consequences for corrupt politicians? Building on studies of motivated reasoning and asymmetric partisan bias, this article highlights the importance of partisan differences in how voters interpret corruption convictions and make voting decisions. I contend that in post-authoritarian democracies, supporters of authoritarian legacy parties (ALPs) are less likely to punish corrupt copartisan incumbents compared to supporters of other parties faced with equally corrupt copartisan incumbents. While voters of all kinds appear likely to ignore corruption among copartisan incumbents, supporters of authoritarian legacy parties are particularly likely to do so. Using original datasets from South Korea, this study shows empirical evidence of the lack of corruption voting for ALP partisans across three legislative elections. This article further finds partisan discrepancies and a striking lack of corruption voting among authoritarian legacy partisans.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of East Asian Studies Vol. 23, No.2; Jul 2023: p.241 - 262
Journal SourceJournal of East Asian Studies Vol: 23 No 2
Key WordsPartisan Bias ;  Authoritarian Legacies ;  Authoritarian Nostalgia ;  corruption voting


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text