| ID | 192539 |
| Title Proper | Justifying economic coercion |
| Other Title Information | the discourse of victimhood in China’s unilateral sanctions policy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gloria, Enrico V |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | China remains reluctant in claiming unilateral economic sanctions as a valid form of statecraft. China has consistently withheld official acknowledgment of its use of unilateral sanctions despite using them in different disputes. This has resulted to observations arguing that China is increasingly approaching the use of sanctions in a stealthier, therefore, more aggressive manner. It begs to ask, how does China’s reluctant attitude towards its use of unilateral economic sanctions fit into China’s overall foreign policy logic? More specifically, how does China’s victimhood discourse justify unilateral sanctions and at the same time, promote a positive identity of itself in light of coercion? This paper argues that China’s consistent vague acknowledgment and denial in claiming a direct hand on unilateral sanctions comes from its broad foreign policy objective of maintaining a positive identity through its discourse of victimhood. To uncover this understanding, this paper analyzes China’s official positions in six bilateral disputes where China has resorted to unilateral sanctions. While existing observations only stop at ‘plausible deniability’ as primary explanation for China’s vague rhetoric, analyzing China’s predication strategies provides a necessary nuancing in terms of how this peculiar behavior remains consistent with China’s overall foreign policy logic. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 36, No.3; May 2023: p.521-551 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 36 No 3 |
| Key Words | Economic Sanctions ; Critical Discourse Analysis ; Chinese Foreign Policy ; Victimhood ; Predication Strategy |