Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:859Hits:20008405Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID193117
Title ProperInternational Negotiations in the Shadow of Elections
LanguageENG
AuthorSmith, Alastair ;  Justin Melnick and Alastair Smith ;  Melnick, Justin
Summary / Abstract (Note)Within a formal model of international agreements in the shadow of renegotiations and domestic competition, we highlight three important ways elections shape international agreements. Elections determine who will be in control of policy in the future, which affects how leaders bargain today. Elections also determine the deals policymakers will agree to. Finally, proposers have the opportunity to shape the contours of domestic political competition with what is offered in pre-electoral bargaining. We identify that several canonical results in the literature – like the Schelling conjecture or the idea that hawkish leaders have an innate bargaining advantage over dovish leaders – only hold under certain restrictions on how voters evaluate their leaders. In contrast, we show paradoxically that when voters are prospective, electoral incentives shade the ability for domestic leaders to negotiate better deals for their publics. Counterintuitively, this leads to hawks agreeing to more conciliatory agreements than doves.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 67, No.7-8; Aug-Sep 2023: p.1452-1481
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 67 No 7-8
Key WordsInternational Cooperation ;  Negotiations ;  Domestic Politics ;  Bargaining


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text