| ID | 193120 |
| Title Proper | Elite Cues and Public Attitudes Towards Military Alliances |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Alley, Joshua |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Do elite cues exert extensive, conditional or minimal influence on public support for military alliances in the United States? I assess the boundaries of elite leadership on public opinion towards alliances by dividing partisan respondents into wings based on isolationism and militant assertiveness. If co-partisan elite cues change public attitudes across three or four wings within their party, elites exert extensive influence. Elite cues exert conditional influence if they reach two party wings, and minimal influence if they impact one or no wings. Using two conjoint survey experiments to examine public attitudes towards forming and maintaining international alliances, I find that elite cues exert extensive influence, but some individuals hold rigid alliance attitudes. Staunch alliance supporters in the Democratic party and consistent alliance skeptics in the Republican party both discount elite cues. Therefore, elites can lead most party wings with alliance cues, but intra-party divisions can constrain their influence. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 67, No.7-8; Aug-Sep 2023: p.1537-1563 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 67 No 7-8 |
| Key Words | Alliance ; Public Opinion ; International Security ; Domestic Politics ; Democratic Institutions ; Elite Cues |