Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:733Hits:19996445Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID193132
Title ProperSource Governance of Social Disputes in China
LanguageENG
AuthorWu, Ying ;  Hu, Jieren
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines the features and limits of a new dispute resolution mechanism implemented by Chinese courts called, “Source Governance of Social Disputes” (SGSD). Differing from existing extralegal means of dispute resolution, SGSD aims to bring courts back to the center of dispute resolution by pre-emptively intervening in dispute-prone processes via technology-based mechanisms. However, this has generated two pitfalls. Although preemptive repression can be adopted by deploying digital technologies to impose mediation on people and persuade them to make compromises, such technological deployment by and large fails to resolve the root causes of social disputes. Additionally, SGSD introduces new risks of technological abuse which may coerce litigants to accept mediation instead of adjudication, causing an erosion of public confidence in the Chinese legal system and a weakening of regime legitimacy.
`In' analytical NoteCritical Asian Studies Vol. 55, No.3; Sep 2023: p.354-376
Journal SourceCritical Asian Studies 2023-09 55, 3
Key WordsDispute resolution ;  Digital Technology ;  Chinese Legal System ;  Stability Maintenance