Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1157Hits:19500976Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID193172
Title ProperSystemic effects of economic interdependence and the militarisation of diplomacy
Other Title Information1914 and beyond
LanguageENG
AuthorLevy, Jack S ;  Mulligan, William
Summary / Abstract (Note)Empirical research generally supports the dyadic-level trade-promotes-peace hypothesis, while demonstrating that the relationship is weaker, more complex, and more conditional than liberal theory suggests. We shift to the system level and examine a neglected path to conflict in economically interdependent systems. In the great power competition for support among smaller states, a great power at a competitive disadvantage in economic instruments of influence may be incentivised to adopt more militarised strategies. We illustrate our argument with case studies of Austro-Hungarian and Russian influence strategies before the First World War and of Prussian strategies among German states before the Franco-Prussian War.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Strategic Studies Vol. 46, No.5; Oct 2023: p.894-920
Journal SourceJournal of Strategic Studies Vol: 46 No 5
Key WordsMilitarisation ;  First World War ;  Economic Interdependence ;  Economic Coercion ;  Great Power Competition


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text