| ID | 193233 |
| Title Proper | Regional international organizations in Africa as recipients of foreign aid |
| Other Title Information | Why are some more attractive to donors than others? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Panke, Diana ; Sören Stape ; Stape, Sören ; Söderbaum, Fredrik |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Foreign aid to regional international organizations (RIOs) has increased tremendously in recent decades. The vast differences between RIOs give rise to the question of why some RIOs attract considerable amounts of aid while others attract much less, or even nothing at all. To address that question, this article sets out and examines a set of hypotheses that focus on various characteristics of RIOs that allow donors to reduce transaction costs. Empirically, the analysis proceeds via two steps: the hypotheses are first subjected to an empirical plausibility probe based on quantitative methods and then illustrated based on case study of the Southern African Development Community. The findings reveal that RIOs are most attractive when they operate in a range of policy fields, involve many member-states and are engaged in long-lasting collaborations with donors. By contrast, there is little support for conventional explanations as to why RIOs attract funding – for instance, claims that being democratic, being most in need or providing donors with market access will lead to greater funding. The rather disturbing policy implication is that a small number of RIOs are likely to continue to attract the bulk of funding, whereas poorly funded RIOs are unlikely to attract significant amounts of aid. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cooperation and Conflict Vol. 58, No.4; Dec 2023: p.522-541 |
| Journal Source | Cooperation and Conflict Vol: 58 No 4 |
| Key Words | Regionalism ; Foreign Aid ; Africa ; Southern African Development Community |