| ID | 193627 |
| Title Proper | Decline and Fall of Malaysia’s Dominant-party System |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Meredith L. Weiss ; Weiss, Meredith L. ; Suffian, Ibrahim |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Malaysia’s 15th general election in November 2022 decisively ended the country’s dominant-party system. What might take its place, however, remains hazy—how competitive, how polarized, how politically liberal, and how stable an order might emerge will take some time to become clear. The opposition Pakatan Harapan (Alliance of Hope), having secured a plurality of seats, but with a sharply pronounced ethnic skew, formed a coalition government with the previously dominant, incumbent Barisan Nasional (National Front) and smaller, regional coalitions. This settlement resolved an immediate impasse, but relied upon obfuscation of real programmatic, ideological, and identity differences, raising questions of longer-term durability or results. Examining this uncertainty, we broach three broad queries, with resonance well beyond Malaysia. First, we examine the fragmentation and reconsolidation of Malaysian party politics to explore how party dominance transforms or collapses. Second, we explore the extent to which its dominant party defined or confirmed Malaysia as electoral-authoritarian, and whether we should still consider it so. Third, we ask what possibilities Malaysia’s apparent party-system deinstitutionalization opens up for structural reform beyond parties. Does the deterioration of that system—more than simply the previous dominant party’s electoral loss—clear the way for more far-reaching liberalization? All told, we find that Malaysia’s incremental dismantling of its dominant-party system does not also spell the end of electoral authoritarianism. Party and party-system deinstitutionalization leave the system in flux, but illiberal reconsolidation is as plausible as progressive structural reform. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Affairs Vol. 96, No.2; Jun 2023: p.281-302 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Affairs Vol: 96 No 2 |
| Key Words | Malaysia ; Elections ; Electoral Authoritarianism ; Hybrid Regime ; Party Institutionalization ; Dominant-Party System ; Party-System Institutionalization |