|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
118479
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
189145
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE Russia-Islamic World Strategic Vision Group (RIW SVG) was created 15 years ago, after Russia, on President Vladimir Putin's initiative, joined the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) as an observer in 2005. The OIC (formerly the Organization of the Islamic Conference) is an international organization of Muslim countries with a total population of more than 1.5 billion. It was founded on September 25, 1969, and consists of 57 states, 49 of which are Muslim-majority countries. The RIW's first cochairs were Yevgeny Primakov and Mintimer Shaymiyev, who laid the foundation for its activities and traditions. The RIW is currently chaired by Tatarstan President Rustam Minnikhanov.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
052356
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
118314
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The European Union (EU), the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) are locked in a struggle for the future of Europe that encompasses very different visions. The EU aims for a highly sophisticated Western civilization; the Brotherhood and OIC see Europe as part of a future global Caliphate, an Islamic empire governed by an Islamist version of traditional Islamic law, or sharia. This competition extends to the United Nations where the OIC is seeking to enforce global prohibitions on criticism of Islam. A comparison of the EU's actions with those of the U.S. federal government shows that U.S. policymakers, in confronting a similar challenge, are making many of the same errors as their European counterparts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
125106
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
I am deeply pleased and honored to be in this prestigious institution of diplomacy in this wonderful historical mansion, which serves the great tradition of Russian nation and Foreign Office; and I am honored by the presence of many distinguished diplomats, ambassadors, academicians, and public figures.
At the outset, I need to say a few remarks about the developing relationship between the Russian Federation and the OIC, being the Secretary General who has the honor of working for development of official relationship between the Russian Federation and the OIC since 2005. We have reached a very important point where Russia has become very active within the framework of its status as the observer state. We have frequent political consultations; we have developed institutional cooperation regarding political issues. Meanwhile, in economic matters, in financial matters, in cultural matters and in other areas, we have improved relations. Yesterday, there was an agreement between some OIC institutions and economic institutions of this country for expanding the cooperation between the OIC and the Russian Federation. Also the relationships of Tatarstan and Bashkortostan with the OIC institutions, like Islamic Development Bank (IDB), Standards and Metrology Institute for Islamic Countries (SMIIC), Islamic Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICO), are increasing in such fields as halal food, Islamic banking and the like; and I am really happy with this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
063130
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
000485
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Radiant Pub., 1998.
|
| Description |
xii,181p.
|
| Standard Number |
817027249X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 041816 | 327.54/PUN 041816 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
169821
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India has an unpleasant history with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), an organization which claims to be the voice of Muslims world over. India’s relations with the Muslim countries have vastly improved, especially those in West Asia as Indian economy is seen as an opportunity by these countries. However, OIC as an organization has always made statements about India’s internal affairs, mainly over Kashmir. This has been a major irritant in India-OIC relations. This article will explain India’s historical engagement with OIC, the major irritants in this relationship and the way forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
192463
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE principles of modern Russia's foreign policy are laid down primarily in the Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation,1 the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation,2 and the Concept of Russia's Humanitarian Policy Abroad.3 These documents outline the main ideas, strategic goals, and objectives of the formation and implementation of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation, including with regard to Muslim countries. The 2023 Policy Concept says: "The states of friendly Islamic civilization are becoming increasingly desirable and reliable partners of Russia in ensuring security and stability, as well as in solving economic problems at the global and regional levels."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
173269
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE "LIMINALITY" and "re-lslamization" phenomena1 caused by the split in the ranks of the Islamic theological elite into the moderate majority (minimalists) and radically minded minority (maximalists) [Waghid. 2011:5-8] came to the fore in some of the North African Arab countries and in many sub-Saharan countries with considerable Islamic populations. Radicalization of apart of the Islamic political elite betrays itself in a much greater political and military activity of Muslim maximalists and a much wider scope of activities of extremist Islamic organizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
063049
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
174515
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
RUSSIA has historically evolved as a multiethnic and multireligious state. Having passed through complex social experiments and spiritual quests and explorations that deeply affected the foundations of human and social life, the citizens of the Russian Federation have emerged as a single, multiethnic people, as a Russian nation. And this despite the greatest tragedy of the late 20th century - namely, the disintegration of a single country, i.e., the Soviet Union, into several post-Soviet states, including historical Russia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
119392
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
132035
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
062176
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
055137
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
008996
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
June 1995.
|
| Description |
61-63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
183188
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The United Nations embraced the doctrine of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) in 2005, which states that it is a shared responsibility of the international community to protect peoples from the atrocities of war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing, and genocide. Regarding Myanmar, the UN Human Rights Council claimed there were gross violations of human rights and international law in Myanmar's Rakhine state. Also, the UN Independent Fact-Finding Mission found evidence of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, and accordingly requested that the international community employ R2P to protect the Rohingya people. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights acknowledged the clearance operation that occurred on 25 August 2017 at the hands of the Myanmar military regime was a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing”. In spite of this, the international community has taken no effective measures to protect the Rohingya community from what was an “entirely predictable” act of genocide. This paper is a qualitative investigation, a review of possible strategic reasons for why the international community has failed to protect the Rohingya. The paper relies on secondary scholarly literature, policy records, UN, government, and NGO reports, grey literature sources, and online materials. ASEAN's non-interference strategy, the OIC's dependency on diplomacy, the EU's priority for the hybrid democratic transition of Myanmar, the UN's political dialogue strategy, and the UN Security Council's structural weaknesses are obstacles to the international community preventing genocide in Myanmar. This study contributes to understanding the strategies of ASEAN, OIC, EU, UN, ICC, and the ICJ in relation to the Rohingya issue. It examines the chances of these organisations championing R2P, and also considers whether the Rohingya crisis is too intractable or difficult to resolve under current arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
164209
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
ESTEEMED COLLEAGUES, friends, welcome to the International Affairs magazine. Today, with this roundtable, we are resuming the tradition of holding our meetings and discussions in our old mansion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
192464
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE Russia-Islamic World Strategic Vision Group (RIW SVG) worked up gradually toward its May 19, 2023 meeting in Kazan1 by holding a number of other events, conferences and forums, including meetings abroad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|