| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
019517
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2001.
|
| Description |
174-195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
064734
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Apr-Jun 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
103414
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
018540
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2001.
|
| Description |
15-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
054379
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
146456
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The demise of the Doha round of trade negotiations is often attributed to deadlocks in agricultural negotiations between the developed and the developing world. Why has agriculture been so difficult to negotiate? This article explains North-South agricultural negotiations through the lens of coalition politics, especially the shift from bloc to issue-based diplomacy from the developing world. We argue against the proposition in the negotiation literature that multiple coalitions at the international level allow negotiators room to maneuver. Our study shows that bloc coalitions in fact allowed for compromise more than issue-based coalitions in agriculture, which are often supported by strong domestic constituencies. Empirically, the article focuses on the Uruguay Round when the North and South struck an agreement on agriculture and the Doha Round, which remains deadlocked. The article also provides an in-depth case study of India’s agricultural interests and its food security program in the context of the WTO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
052017
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jul-Dec 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
090426
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As part of the Doha Development Agenda, many members of the World Trade Organization and, in particular, its director-general have actively promoted the so-called Aid for Trade initiative. Rather than offer a comprehensive account of this initiative, the purpose here is to consider its implications for proposals to fill in the WTO's "missing middle," that is, for suggestions to develop the WTO's non-negotiating, nonjuridical, deliberative functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
113961
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The world trading system is characterized by a growing number of free trade agreements (FTAs). Limited progress in the negotiations at the multilateral level within the WTO has contributed to this development, inducing countries to seek faster, alternative ways to speed up liberalization, which make it possible to take advantage of preferential treatment with key trading partners. This article discusses what role the WTO should take with regard to FTAs in times of stalled multilateral negotiations and proliferating FTAs, and how FTAs can contribute to the multilateralization of regionalism. When results at the multilateral level are scarce, there may be a shift towards other alternatives in which the WTO is left out. This may force the WTO to function reactively, simply facing facts as an organization, rather than proactively, where it may play some role in shaping the FTA development. FTAs are not an entirely separate phenomenon from the WTO, since countries that negotiate FTAs play two roles. They are members of the WTO and as such are part of the work and negotiations of the organization. They are also part of trade arrangements that are limited to a smaller number of countries, and hence can negotiate against the interest of the entire multilateral organization. This article explores how these agreements can facilitate the work and negotiations of the WTO to regionalize bilateralism and multilateralize regionalism, here named the "sticky rice" approach. Various East Asian trade arrangements are used as empirical examples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
019878
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Aug 25, 2001.
|
| Description |
3226-3232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
052726
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
180248
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India has imposed anti-dumping duties (ADDs) on a total of 155 commodities against China across many sectors to protect the domestic industry since 2001. The dumping of Chinese goods into Indian markets has led to the downfall and closure of many domestic industries. Under such circumstances, ADDs had been necessitated for protecting the domestic industry. As per the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, imposition of ADDs on imports is permitted, provided that the affected country establishes that the domestic industry has suffered material injury by such imports. An elaborate discussion explaining the investigation pertaining to ADD and imposition of ADD in relation with WTO rules is presented in the present article. During the period between 2014 and 2018, ADD has been imposed on a total of 121 commodities. The study finds that ADDs have been partially effective in reducing the imports of the commodities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
012193
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1997.
|
| Description |
19-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
090498
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
120547
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE FAST CHANGING international situation requires Russia's flexible and timely reaction to the new challenges and threats to its security that arise in the process of the constant evolution of the entire system of modern international relations. At the same time, the Russian Federation, too, is in the process of transformation; it is acquiring new possibilities for an effective response to these challenges and threats; the structure of its national security interests is changing, which should find its reflection in Russia's new foreign policy concept. It is therefore not surprising that among the first decrees V.V. Putin signed after his inauguration as the president of Russia is the decree "On Measures to Ensure the Realization of the Russian Federation's Foreign Policy Course" that instructed the RF Foreign Ministry to present a new draft of the RF foreign policy concept. This will be the country's fourth foreign policy concept since the disintegration of the USSR 21 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
068797
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
046593
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Singapore, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, 2001.
|
| Description |
21p.
|
| Series |
IDSS working paper; no. 18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 045067 | 382.9/DES 045067 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
057999
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
066631
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
060680
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Mar 2005.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Shared interests between Australia and the European Union (EU) in multilateral trade negotiations are increasing. However, the relationship in the WTO continues to be defined by conflicts over agriculture. This article examines the case for closer Australia-EU co-operation on shared interests in WTO negotiations while continuing to press for more rapid reform of EU agriculture policies. It traces the major changes in the interface between Australia and the EU in the WTO, including the re-structuring of the Australian economy over the past two decades and the more recent efforts by the EU to modify the trade impact of the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) on world agriculture trade. The article concludes that closer co-operation between Australia and the EU in the WTO on shared interests would enhance Australia's influence in the multilateral trade system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|