| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
011718
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dec 1996.
|
| Description |
327-346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
066727
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
009419
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Fall 1995.
|
| Description |
28-42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
065664
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
051966
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
016515
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
June 1993.
|
| Description |
37-39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
002433
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Ottawa, Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security, 1991.
|
| Description |
64p.
|
| Series |
Canadian Institute for International Peace and security working paper; 39
|
| Standard Number |
0-662-19329-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 033527 | 327.174/RIO 033527 | Main | Withdrawn | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
050955
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
065639
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1998.
|
| Description |
p.129-144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
052433
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2004.
|
| Description |
p143-161
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The web of measures that comprise the nuclear non-proliferation regime continues to hold at bay the 'nuclear-armed crowd' that was part of President John F. Kennedy's alarming vision in 1963. The number of nuclear weapons states in 2004 stands at only eight or nine, and assertive steps may yet keep this number from growing. The proliferation of biological weapons, however, is quite another matter. Biotechnological capacity is increasing and spreading rapidly. This trend seems unstoppable, since the economic, medical and food-security benefits of genetic manipulation appear so great. As a consequence, thresholds for the artificial enhancement or creation of dangerous pathogens - disease causing organisms - will steadily drop. Neither Cold War bilateral arms control nor multilateral non-proliferation provide good models for how we are to manage this new challenge. Much more than in the nuclear case, civilisation will have to cope with, rather than shape, its biological future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
008028
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Sept 1995.
|
| Description |
247-256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
052399
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
017087
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May 21-June 3 1994.
|
| Description |
10-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
064339
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
008868
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 1994.
|
| Description |
53-83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
008030
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct 1995.
|
| Description |
56-59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
057868
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
158429
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article offers an alternative understanding of India’s post-Cold War grand strategy by arguing that policy issues should be treated as a continuum within which there may be strategic policy innovations, leading to both nuanced continuity and change in foreign policy. Our argument stands in contradistinction to the dominant scholarship in the Indian foreign policy literature, the “transformation scholarship” as we term it, which views policy issues as binary, finds a “new” emphasis on material interests since the end of the Cold War and advocates this as both rational and commendable. Applying four key claims in the dominant transformation scholarship to two important Indian foreign policy issues, nuclear non-proliferation and climate change, we find that, rather than sweeping change in Indian grand strategy, as implied and advocated by transformation scholars, Indian grand strategy is in a state of flux, encapsulating some change but also much continuity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
051680
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May-Jun 2004.
|
| Description |
May-Jun 2004
|
| Summary/Abstract |
It would take some doing, including the imposition of an effective enforcement mechanism, but a nuclear-free zone could be the best answer to proliferation in the Middle East
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
051984
|
|
|