|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
145552
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Employment and labour market regulation initially appeared as one of the solid red lines in the UK's renegotiation of the country's place in the EU. The basic argument is that the UK's more deregulated labour market would sit uneasily in the more organised models, based on statutory instruments or collective bargaining, found on the continent. While there is a legitimate problem here, EU employment regulations appear manageable from the point of view of business, while unions see them as important tools for socially responsible economic restructuring. Most of UK employment case law is now deeply entangled with EU law; labour market regulations have, on the whole, become part of the way of doing business in the Single Market; and a simple cost–benefit analysis appears impossible because some costs are not quantifiable and the costs of others are reduced when taken as a bundle. Labour unions agree that transposition of European law needs to be done taking into account local sensitivities, while internationally oriented companies do not see EU regulations on the whole as detrimental to business. Importantly, though, the costs and benefits of EU employment regulations are not symmetrically distributed across different companies: large companies are better able to reap the rewards and accommodate the costs of operating in the Single Market than smaller companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
099106
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article argues that off-shore is losing its exceptionality by being absorbed into a broader process of variegation and deterritorialization of sovereignty, and that capital's search for a new "fix" is driving this process. Capital goes off-shore by exploiting non-territorial definitions of sovereignty, as a means of shifting the regulatory regime under which social relations take place, without moving in a geographic sense. In this way, capital shields itself from social control by defining certain spaces and contexts as off-shore, creating spaces of production in which the sovereign regulatory capacities of the state and society are systematically constrained. This "unbundling" and deterritorialization of sovereignty is a way for capital to escape from national class compromises and undermine working-class associational power. As tensions and contradictions created by off-shore production unravel, conditions on-shore and offshore converge, and off-shore loses its distinctiveness. Ultimately, this process threatens to undermine the sovereignty norm, state autonomy, and capitalist hegemony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
041867
|
|
|
Publication |
London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1973.
|
Description |
432p.
|
Standard Number |
0046581693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
012086 | 338.0952041/DOR 012086 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
041986
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Shri Ram centre for industrial relations, 1971.
|
Description |
vi, 144p.Hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
007680 | 658.3151/DHI 007680 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
041997
|
|
|
Publication |
Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1969.
|
Description |
xiv, 182p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
001912 | 331/GUP 001912 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
109158
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Based on quantitative indicators for fifteen advanced countries between 1974 and 2005, and case studies of France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Sweden, and Ireland, this article analyzes the trajectory of institutional change in the industrial relations systems of advanced capitalist societies, with a focus on Western Europe. In contrast to current comparative political economy scholarship, which emphasizes the resilience of national institutions to common challenges and trends, it argues that despite a surface resilience of distinct national sets, all countries have been transformed in a neoliberal direction. Neoliberal transformation manifests itself not just as institutional deregulation but also as institutional conversion, as the functions associated with existing institutional forms change in a convergent direction. A key example is the institution of centralized bargaining, once the linchpin of an alternative, redistributive and egalitarian, model of negotiated capitalism, which has been reshaped in the past twenty years to fit the common imperative of liberalization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
041914
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House Pvt.Ltd., 1980.
|
Description |
147p.
|
Standard Number |
0706910303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
022643 | 338.0954/MAL 022643 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
041020
|
|
|
Publication |
Bombay, Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., 1972.
|
Description |
xv, 296p.Hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
010248 | 658.4010954/AGA 010248 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
041991
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, S.Chand & co (pvt) Ltd., 1971.
|
Description |
xv, 290p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
007422 | 338.90954/MAH 007422 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
172412
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Since 2017 the British Labour Party has proposed mandatory sectoral collective bargaining (SCB) as a comprehensive strategy to rebuild the trade union voice across the entire economy. The intellectual roots lie in the Institute of Employment Rights’ (IER) Manifesto for Labour Law (2016). First, this article explains the core IER approach, questioning its feasibility given current low levels of union membership and bargaining coverage and whether it would produce the stable and productive economy promised. Second, the article develops four social science objections to this state‐driven approach centred on industrial relations history; political sociology; economics; and political philosophy. The conclusion argues that while stronger voluntary trade unions could help, it is neither practicable nor desirable for the state to impose a trade union, single‐channel approach to employee voice. Instead, a ‘mixed economy of voice’ is proposed, perhaps including statutory works councils, which speaks directly to all employees—union and non‐union—and wins broader political, employer and public support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
193039
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article analyses the incorporation of social dialogue in industrial relations and its role in pacifying public sector unions in Zambia. A sample of 19 managers of public institutions and union leaders in Lusaka participated in the research. The research reveals that social dialogue is used to pacify trade unions as governments implement structural adjustment policies, which bring about poor employment conditions. Although the unions have responded to pacification by diversifying and servicing their membership, they are still weak. This finding is significant because it helps us to understand why unions in Southern Africa are weak in the post-independence era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
183935
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
While studies on local labor activism in Indonesia have blossomed in recent years, they rarely look at the role played by informal politics. Using a case study at the grassroots level in Makassar that focuses on industrial relations, we look to start filling this gap. We explore how labor activism in industrial situations, such as factory strikes and protests, has evolved under informal political circumstances. We find that these relations are dominant and highly significant for influencing labor activism at the local level. Moreover, we find the emergence of informal politics is mainly influenced by the fragmentation of labor unions, the personalism of labor leadership, and the pragmatism of union officials and workers. All of these tend to trigger informal political participation, such as brokerage, illegality, and kinship, that can overshadow local labor activism in factories. We conclude with a discussion of how the influence of informal politics has weakened labor activism at the local level and ways to distinguish the patterns, characteristics, and vulnerabilities of workers in industrial relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
094751
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The French and German political economies have been significantly reconfigured over the past two decades. Although the changes have often been more piecemeal than revolutionary, their cumulative effects are profound. The authors characterize the changes that have taken place as involving the institutionalization of new forms of dualism and argue that what gives contemporary developments a different character from the past is that dualism is now explicitly underwritten by state policy. They see this outcome as the culmination of a sequence of developments, beginning in the field of industrial relations, moving into labor market dynamics, and finally finding institutional expression in welfare state reforms. Contrary to theoretical accounts that suggest that institutional complementarities support stability and institutional reproduction, the authors argue that the linkages across these realms have helped to translate employer strategies that originated in the realm of industrial relations into a stable, new, and less egalitarian model with state support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
048258
|
|
|
Publication |
Stamford, JAI Press, 1998.
|
Description |
xvi,
|
Series |
International review of comparative public policy. v. 10
|
Contents |
Contents: p.1 Labor markets in industrialized countries. p. 2 Labor markets in transitional and industrializing economies
|
Standard Number |
0762303751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
042652 | 320.607/DON 042652 | Main | Withdrawn | General | |
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
085302
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Olsonian theory supposes that when labor unions are organized in an encompassing manner at the industrial and national levels, they can better prevent collective action problems and bring about more stable industrial relations. This theory regards the encompassing labor organization as a positive institution. However, the Korean case shows weak theoretical and empirical relevance for the proposition, as institutionalized talks between government, business, and labor did not contribute to establishing stability in industrial relations. In some respects, the situation only worsened. The Korean case therefore suggests that the optimistic propositions of encompassing organizations of labor require a careful reassessment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
038009
|
|
|
Publication |
London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1973.
|
Description |
261p.Hbk
|
Series |
British Sociological association industrial Studies
|
Standard Number |
0043010555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
011431 | 658.5/CHI 011431 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
042006
|
|
|
Publication |
Paris, Organisation for economic cooperation and development, 1985.
|
Description |
103p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
004667 | 658.301/SCO 004667 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
154077
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This paper explores how gender ideologies shape industrial relations in the Asian garment industry. Drawing on ethnographic research, it illustrates how widespread norm perceptions of acquiescent women and assertive men reinforce patriarchal, authoritarian unions. Even if privately critical, women may be reluctant to protest if they anticipate social disapproval. Such beliefs reinforce patriarchal unions, curbing women workers’ collective analysis, engagement, and activism. This weakens the collective power of labour to push for better working conditions. Tackling norm perceptions and building more inclusive unions may help strengthen the labour movement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
101311
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article provides a seminal analysis of collective labour legislation in Taiwan. A chronological review of Taiwan's legislative process suggests that the context of incorporation, institutional framework, mechanisms for delivering reforms, and sequence of reforms together shape the legislative outcomes of labour reforms at the collective level. While most labour legislation was revised and passed after the preceding sequence of economic transition, the reform of collective labour rights was greatly constrained by the flexible labour-market structure. In order for politicians to form new alliances with labour organizations, legislation of collective labour rights was a strategy to cultivate support during electoral periods. Consequently, the industrial relations changed following the enactment of substantial reform-oriented labour legislation. Theore-tically, the historical analysis of legislative procedure unveils evolutionary reform paths for collective labour rights in new democracies. At the same time, empirically, Taiwan demonstrates an alternative reform path in combination with incremental steps and progressive agendas. For new democracies of small economy, a window of opportunity for the progress in collective labour legislation remains open today, albeit with limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
044898
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Inter-India publications, 1990.
|
Description |
310p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
8121002508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
031422 | 954.04/PAT 031422 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|