| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
044669
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Springer Verlag Berlin, 1974.
|
| Description |
xii, 572p.
|
| Standard Number |
0540067566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 014928 | 341.552/MAX 014928 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
158371
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The jurists who entered Turkish academia during the 1930s built the foundations of their discipline under a regime that became increasingly authoritarian as war drew closer. Like their peers in Italy and France, therefore, they had to produce coherent doctrines but also support the frequent use of exceptional emergency powers. How did they solve this contradiction? More importantly, what consequences did their solutions have for the use of emergency powers after the war? This article adopts a Deleuzian reading of two strategies with which Turkish jurists met that challenge, approaching their work not simply as theories about law but also as models for the role law should play in the articulation of public authority. Focusing on Ali Fuad Başgil and Sıddık Sami Onar, law professors at Istanbul University, I argue that although both professors supported the regime, only a situational doctrine of the kind Onar produced was capable of ensuring that jurists would have a place in the exercise of “exceptional” state powers after the 1950 transition to democracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
030342
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Washington, U.S.Government Printing Office, 1980.
|
| Description |
iv,78p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 020349 | 355.30973/UNI 020349 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
127678
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article studies agencification and commercialisation within the Georgian police, specifically the Protection Police Department as the successor organisation of the old extra-departmental guards. Despite ostensibly having been scheduled for privatisation from 2004, this unit was instead expanded and strengthened. Given the centrality of police reform in establishing the Saakashvili government's reformist credentials, this represents a critical case testing the limits of top-down neoliberal reform within the very institution that was seen as its centrepiece. It also shows how neo-managerialist forms of organisation-in particular the public law agency-are used to camouflage what remains, essentially, Soviet-style organisation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
037923
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Washington, American Entuprise Institute for Public Policy Reseach, 1984.
|
| Description |
xii, 11p.
|
| Series |
Francis Boyer Lectures on public policy
|
| Standard Number |
0844713708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 025046 | 342/025046 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|