Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
114714
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
095653
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
148966
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Civil–military relations, a subject of enduring concern in the US and a matter of intense debate during the presidential administration of Bill Clinton, have receded in the public mind to a matter of little immediate concern. As such, it is important to determine what tomorrow’s senior military leaders are thinking in this regard. Gregory Foster analyses the views expressed by a number of these future leaders enrolled in a course on civil–military relations at the National Defense University in Washington, DC, providing an insight into the minds of those who will lead tomorrow’s US military.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
140792
|
|
|
Edition |
1st ed.
|
Publication |
London, Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd., 1988.
|
Description |
255p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
0747502250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
030632 | 923.5/LUC 030632 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
104680
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
131058
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
How does political competition among domestic actors influence foreign policy choice? Studies examining these questions often focus on the role of economic or partisan interests, and how they influence the preferences of decision makers who are subject to electoral institutions and pressures of their constituents. Less attention has been paid to how the preferences of other influential but unelected actors influence state behavior. I examine the influence of one such group by looking at how American military leaders shape decisions on military spending and force structure, while also examining how these decisions have been affected by changes to the institutions governing civil-military relations. Results indicate that military leaders occupying key positions can influence defense spending priorities in favor of their respective branches. Results also suggest the influence of military leaders has changed and is conditional upon the institutions governing the relationships between civilian decision makers and military leaders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
176349
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Counting hulls and emphasizing advanced platforms obscures the real problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
124680
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In his years as COAS, General Ashfaq Pravez Kayani has by default done some good to the bilateral relationship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
133151
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The International Criminal Court (icc) came into force in July 2002 with the potential to drastically alter both the war fighting and peacemaking behavior of states. The icc is designed to try and subsequently punish those found guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Supporters of the icc have argued that its establishment will erode the norm of impunity that state and military leaders have historically enjoyed. Yet, another logic suggests that the initiation of an icc investigation or the issuance of an arrest warrant for individuals embroiled in an ongoing dispute may make matters worse. Such individuals may see little reason to stop fighting and reach a settlement if conflict resolution results in their detention in The Hague. Indeed, suspected war criminals and their patrons may wish to escalate their violence in order to avoid showing any sign of weakness or possibility of capitulation lest their enemies press the fight or their rivals seek to undermine their authority. In this article, we explore the potential impact of the icc on the likelihood of peace by examining the impact of actions by the icc - the initiation of investigations into conflict situations and the issuance of arrest warrants for those suspected of committing violations of international law - on the likelihood of mediation. Our findings suggest that while icc arrest warrants can encourage mediation, the initiation of investigations by the icc can actually undermine the occurrence of mediation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
139328
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The relationship between weapon technology and the personnel who use it is a fascinating subject deserving of in-depth scrutiny, especially in an age when automation seems a preferred option of military leaders. Sophie Lefeez interviewed French army personnel who have used the Milan and Javelin missile systems to explore the relationship between operators’ familiarity with a weapon system and the system's adaptability to different uses and environments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
139330
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The relationship between weapon technology and the personnel who use it is a fascinating subject deserving of in-depth scrutiny, especially in an age when automation seems a preferred option of military leaders. Sophie Lefeez interviewed French army personnel who have used the Milan and Javelin missile systems to explore the relationship between operators’ familiarity with a weapon system and the system's adaptability to different uses and environments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
024681
|
|
|
Publication |
Saigon, United States Information Service, 1973.
|
Description |
138p.pbk
|
Series |
Vietnam: Documents and Research notes, no; 114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
011809 | 959.7043373/VIE 011809 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|