| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
017273
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 1993.
|
| Description |
128-131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
056224
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
021753
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2002.
|
| Description |
31-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
020919
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2001.
|
| Description |
343-349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
022102
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 2002.
|
| Description |
207-222
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article critically examines the argument that the forces of globalisation will see the end of the foreign ministry in the context of Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). It suggests that globalisation is affecting the subject matter of foreign policy-making through four processes: diffusion, enmeshment, contradiction, and transformation. It then looks at three prominent challenges these processes have made to the work of DFAT: politicisation; the volume and contestation of information; and resource-cutting. It concludes that rather than being eroded by globalisation, DFAT has been forced to play a more assertive and diversified role, and that it has responded to these challenges in a highly creative way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
060661
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
020918
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2001.
|
| Description |
337-342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
022101
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 2002.
|
| Description |
197-206
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article examines the capacity of Australia's overseas network to respond to a range of different challenges confronting today's diplomats. These include doing more with less at a time of greater international interaction and activity; deepening our understanding of foreign societies at a time when it can be increasingly dangerous to do so; and doing both these things at a time when questions remain about our basic standpoint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
013857
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 1992.
|
| Description |
14-19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
014151
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1992.
|
| Description |
142-155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
004578
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Canberra, Australian National Univ., 1992.
|
| Description |
30p.
|
| Series |
Strategic and Defence Studies Centre working paper;244
|
| Standard Number |
0-7315-1378-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 033720 | R 327.94059/JOH 033720 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
022103
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 2002.
|
| Description |
223-235
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In July 1987 the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Department of Trade were merged into a single department. Fifteen years on, this article assesses the benefits and costs of the merger. It focuses on two questions. Firstly, did the organisational change meet the objectives being sought: that is, better coordination and greater efficiency, flexibility and responsiveness? Secondly, were Australia's capabilities in managing its international relations enhanced by the merger? The article reaches mainly positive conclusions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
017541
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 2000.
|
| Description |
387-406
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Conventional understandings of Australian foreign policy hold that a decisive break with the past in external relations occurred only after 1972 and the arrival of Gough Whitlam as Prime Minister. Whitlam, it is claimed, began the process of severing out-dated imperial attachments to Britain, thus setting Australia on an independent course in world affairs based on a more mature assessment of the national interest that defined Australia as part of a wider Asia region. In contrast, the period between 1949 and 1972—an era dominated by the premiership of Sir Robert Menzies—is seen as a time of docile subservience to great power protectors, which sustained a conservative and reactionary monoculture at home while alienating Australia’s Asian neighbours abroad. This study contends that this understanding of the beginning of the ‘modern’ era in Australian foreign policy does not accord with the historical evidence. It is, instead, an image that has been ideologically constructed to legitimize Whitlam’s self-proclaimed revolution in foreign affairs and to validate the abortive attempt to integrate Australia into Asia during the 1980s and 1990s. The ruling foreign policy orthodoxy, however, is one that is widely accepted, and little questioned, in Australian academic and journalistic circles. Yet it rests on a profound, and often intentional, misreading of Australian foreign policy during the Menzies era. In effect, the pillars that have supported Australian foreign policy for over two decades since 1972 are myths manufactured in hindsight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
019769
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2001.
|
| Description |
7-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
007017
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 2000.
|
| Description |
141-150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
021755
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2002.
|
| Description |
47-63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
054867
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
051982
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
062340
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
069696
|
|
|