Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:453Hits:19928508Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MALKASIAN, CARTER (8) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   080727


Did the United States Need More Forces in Iraq? Evidence from A / Malkasian, Carter   Journal Article
Malkasian, Carter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2008.
Summary/Abstract A common argument is that the United States deployed inadequate forces to secure Iraq. This paper attempts to back that argument with empiricalevidence. Evidence collected in Al Anbar province strongly suggests that a larger number of forces would have reduced insurgent activity in 2004 and 2005. During this period, suppressing large-scale insurgent activity required directly protecting the population through traditional counterinsurgency techniques, such as patrolling, manning outposts, and running checkpoints. Unfortunately, scarcity of US forces meant that such labor-intensive operations could not be sustained in key areas. Some have argued that the United States should have focused on building indigenous forces as a means of providing the necessary numbers. Yet indigenous forces offered no alternative. Even with embedded advisors and air support, indigenous forces could not survive against a vibrant insurgency sustained by local support. Nothing substituted for large numbers of US ground forces. This conclusion places scarcity of US forces as a major cause of the fiasco in Iraq.
Key Words Insurgency  Iraq  United States  Iraq War 
        Export Export
2
ID:   157579


Edward Lansdale and American's Vietnam demons: a new book explores a legendary advisor who may have had the secret to success in Vietnam - and in winning todays forever war. / Malkasian, Carter   Journal Article
Malkasian, Carter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Key Words United States  Vietnam  World War II  Foreign Policy 
        Export Export
3
ID:   046127


History of modern wars of attrition / Malkasian, Carter 2002  Book
Malkasian, Carter Book
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication Westport, Praeger, 2002.
Description ix, 240p.
Series Studies in military history and international affars
Standard Number 0275973794
        Export Export
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession#Call#Current LocationStatusPolicyLocation
046636355.02/MAL 046636MainOn ShelfGeneral 
4
ID:   176442


Howthe Good War Went Bad America’s Slow-Motion Failure in Afghanistan / Malkasian, Carter   Journal Article
Malkasian, Carter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
        Export Export
5
ID:   188338


Modern war in an Ancient Land: a counterinsurgency review / Malkasian, Carter   Journal Article
Malkasian, Carter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract At the end of 2021, the US Army published Modern War in an Ancient Land: The United States Army in Afghanistan, 2001–2014. It is a major two-volume history of the US Army in the war in Afghanistan. The primary authors are E.J. Degen, Director of the Army's Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) Study Group, and Mark Reardon, a senior civilian historian at US Army Center of Military History. The work has 836 total pages of text and covers most intense period of US combat operations of the war. It is the closest thing that we have yet to an official history of the war and is likely to remain the closest thing for some time. The work contains valuable insights into counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. The authors see the concept as an effective tactical approach if properly aligned with strategy.
        Export Export
6
ID:   071973


Role of perceptions and political reform in counterisnurgency: the case of Western Iraq, 2004-05 / Malkasian, Carter   Journal Article
Malkasian, Carter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract The political side of counterinsurgency has long been recognized as more important than the military side. The major works on counterinsurgency call for political reform that redresses legitimate insurgent grievances. Thereby, insurgents are encouraged to pursue their aims via political instead of military means. In western Iraq, insurgent perceptions of US weakness inhibited effective political reform. Moderate Sunnis did not engage the Coalition or Iraqi government until these perceptions had been revised. The connection between insurgent perceptions and effective political reform deserves greater attention. With the exception of some arguments from the political science field, the literature on counterinsurgency insufficiently addresses the importance of insurgent perceptions.
        Export Export
7
ID:   074803


Signaling resolve, democratization, and the first battle of Fal / Malkasian, Carter   Journal Article
Malkasian, Carter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract Perceptions and efforts to signal resolve can play an important role in counterinsurgency. The Coalition offensive against Fallujah in April 2004 demonstrates the limitations of relying on military force to signal resolve. The offensive catalyzed insurgent violence in Iraq and generated popular support for the insurgency. The Coalition prematurely halted the offensive because the Iraqi Governing Council (IGC) could not maintain support for the Coalition in the face of popular outrage. Given the importance of democratizing Iraq and establishing a sovereign government, the objections of the IGC could not be ignored. Without Iraqi political support, military force ultimately signaled weakness instead of resolve.
Key Words Counterinsurgency  Iraq  Fallujah 
        Export Export
8
ID:   110928


War downsized: how to accomplish more with less / Malkasian, Carter; Weston, J Kael   Journal Article
Malkasian, Carter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract The United States, facing deepening economic and fiscal woes at home, is preparing to withdraw from Afghanistan. More and more policymakers, congressional representatives, and members of the public are calling for the majority of U.S. forces to pull out as quickly as possible and for Washington to shift from an expensive counterinsurgency strategy, in which tens of thousands of U.S. and NATO troops protect the Afghan population, to a cheaper counterterrorism strategy, in which special operations forces strike at terrorist leaders in Afghanistan and Pakistan and the Afghans are left largely on their own.
        Export Export