|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
113224
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Columbia University Press, 2012.
|
| Description |
xii, 274p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780231156882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 056630 | 629.41095/MOL 056630 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
142579
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Brazil's space program represents an anomaly among those of the world's 10 largest economic powers. During a time that has witnessed the rapid emergence of a variety of national space programs—even among lesser powers like Iran and South Korea–Brazil's failure to emerge as a significant space actor requires further analysis. This article traces the history of Brazil's space efforts and examines the factors that have held it back, some of which continue to influence its policies today: inadequate funding, conflicting organizations, poorly handled foreign relations, and an unclear national vision for Brazil's “place” in space. Recent efforts to overcome these hurdles through an improved domestic strategy and smarter international relations show promise. But a more sustained political commitment to space development will be needed if they are to succeed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
102787
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
With the rapid rise of competitive space activities within Asia, this study examines the prospects for increasing international cooperation. After discussing relevant conceptual issues, it surveys the space policies particularly of China, India, Japan, and South Korea and examines the skewed patterns of cooperation seen at the international, regional, and bilateral levels. It then analyzes the historical, technology, and political factors that have impeded, especially regional, space cooperation in Asia to date. The study concludes that expanded regional space cooperation is an unlikely near-term outcome, but the paper also argues that the risks entailed in the current situation are growing and that US policy initiatives could make a difference in helping to lead countries out of this dead-end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
053590
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
076720
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Northeast Asia is a nuclear tinderbox that could easily be set off, given rising regional tensions, widespread nuclear power capabilities, and the absence of strong regional security institutions. Given this context, states need to identify and seek to prevent "trigger events" - circumstances that could stimulate proliferation cascades. While it is important to continue the current emphasis on strengthening supply-side constraints (such as the Proliferation Security Initiative), new efforts to address the demand side are sorely needed. These efforts should include shoring up currently weakened global nonproliferation norms, facilitating direct talks among states on issues of military concern, and renewing efforts to address underlying sources of regional conflict (historical problems, territorial disputes, and the still unresolved Korean War). While difficult, these new approaches offer the best chance of keeping two and a half nuclear states in Northeast Asia from becoming six.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
046684
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Monterey, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, 2002.
|
| Description |
ii, 69p.
|
| Standard Number |
188535004X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 045830 | 358.8/MOL 045830 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
053021
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
049711
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
California, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, 2003.
|
| Description |
55p.
|
| Series |
Occasional Paper; no. 12
|
| Standard Number |
188535004X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 047336 | 358.174/MOL 047336 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
051726
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Routledge, 2000.
|
| Description |
xi, 276p.
|
| Standard Number |
0415923700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 045023 | 355.825119095193/MOL 045023 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
047603
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Routledge, 2000.
|
| Description |
xi, 276p.
|
| Standard Number |
0415923697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 043527 | 355.825119095193/MOL 043527 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
046205
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
California, ABC-Clio, Inc., 2002.
|
| Description |
xv, 375p
|
| Standard Number |
1576073610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 046101 | 355.825119/DIE 046101 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
074784
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Traditional responses to international security concerns include the heightening of distrust, mutual disengagement, and arms deployment. Fortunately, serious threats to security in space do not yet exist. Therefore, an alternative means of diffusing possible problems may be cooperative threat reduction-a tool that has been used effectively by the United States and other countries since 1991 in dealing with the former Soviet Union's weapons of mass destruction legacy. This article analyzes the conceptual rationale for a similar approach to space threats. It also describes the results of a recent project to consider advantages and disadvantages of possible U.S. adoption of such policies with respect to seven current or emerging space rivals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
054640
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Aldershot, Ashgate, 2004.
|
| Description |
xi, 258p.
|
| Standard Number |
0754642577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 048829 | 338.4762145119/MOL 048829 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
123116
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
President Barack Obama has outlined a course toward lower numbers of US nuclear weapons. Much attention has been paid to the US-Russian context, where deterrence is believed to be basically stable and conditions ripe for gradually reducing arsenals on both sides. But considerably less attention has been paid to the possible implications of lower nuclear numbers on other regions of the world and the reactions of both adversaries and US allies. If nuclear reductions are to be stabilizing and beneficial to security, reassurance and strengthened nonproliferation efforts in various regions need to accompany nuclear cuts. But the specific problems and remedies across regions vary. This article summarizes the results of a multi-author study. It concludes that regions with US allies and formal extended deterrence pledges may pose more vexing problems than those areas of the world without such close allies or commitments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
031592
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Boston, Unwin Hyman, 1990.
|
| Description |
xvi, 320p.
|
| Standard Number |
0044452322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 031474 | 327.47056/BRE 031474 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
101220
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
066936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|