| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
059719
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Feb 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
076153
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article examines the prospects for survival of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in the post-9/11 world, arguing that American non-proliferation policy and the future of the NPT are inextricably linked. It discusses the shift from the Clinton administration's nuclear arms control and disarmament agenda of the mid-1990s to the Bush administration's preference for informal arms control regimes and the new policy of non-proliferation exceptionalism that distinguishes between good proliferators (India, Pakistan) and bad proliferators (North Korea, Iran). The Bush administration's penchant for unilateral foreign security policies and its double standards in implementing export restrictions on sensitive technologies while disavowing American nuclear disarmament obligations undermine the NPT bargain and endanger the treaty. The Bush administration's security-oriented strategy and acceptance of selective proliferation for balance of power purposes may lead to the emergence of a silent crowd armed with nuclear weapon capabilities. The key to preserving the relevance of the NPT is to reconnect nuclear non-proliferation with nuclear disarmament, while strengthening the treaty's enforcement machinery against non-compliers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
059718
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Feb 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
059721
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Feb 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
059715
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Feb 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
114423
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty contains a commitment to nuclear disarmament that, some analysts claim, may lead dissatisfied Non-Nuclear-Weapon States to withdraw from the treaty in protest. But what would be the consequences of such a move, and would any of the Non-Nuclear-Weapon States actually ever take such a step? Aaron Haviland traces a history of the treaty, scrutinises the likelihood of withdrawal on a normative basis, and weighs the implications for disarmament.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
058022
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
008619
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March 1995.
|
| Description |
NPT special issue series of articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
119771
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
008044
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 8-12,1995.
|
| Description |
58-59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
004188
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, United Nations, 1991.
|
| Description |
xvi,132p.
|
| Standard Number |
9290450479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 034817 | 355.825119/SCH 034817 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
008045
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March 25,1995.
|
| Description |
PF-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
010053
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1995.
|
| Description |
30-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
009210
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 1994.
|
| Description |
52-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
018555
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Autumn 2000.
|
| Description |
8-29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
008620
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March 1995.
|
| Description |
3-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
066708
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
018091
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2000.
|
| Description |
3-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
011717
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 1997.
|
| Description |
55-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
057984
|
|
|