| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
048946
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Greenhill Books, 1997.
|
| Description |
112p.
|
| Standard Number |
1853672971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039786 | 355.02/MIL 039786 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
068495
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Cambridge, Polity Press, 2006.
|
| Description |
vi, 216p.
|
| Standard Number |
0745623948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 051057 | 323.04/MIL 051057 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
046974
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, John Murray, 2001.
|
| Description |
xi, 273p.
|
| Standard Number |
0719559898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 044581 | 355.33041/MIL 044581 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
096961
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In this paper the authors draw upon the tradition of Power Structure Research to analyse the increased interpenetration of the military and the social sciences, particularly the recruitment of anthropologists and the adoption and adaptation of counterinsurgency strategies. It is argued that such actors should be understood not as disinterested 'experts' but as being organically embedded in a military-industrial-academic complex. The paper considers a number of contemporary examples as well as considering the historical roots of these trends. It is argued that this interpenetration violates the ethical norms of the academy and the moral and social responsibilities of intellectuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
115001
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
041647
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Salamander Book, 1984.
|
| Description |
160p.
|
| Standard Number |
0861011783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024681 | 359.9383/MIL 024681 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
025241
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Salamander Books, 1982.
|
| Description |
159p.
|
| Series |
Salamander book
|
| Standard Number |
0 861011317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024659 | 359.83/MIL 024659 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
148788
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Neo-Kantian political theories, such as those developed by Jeremy Waldron and Anna Stilz, aim to provide an account of state legitimacy and territorial boundaries that avoids the problems faced by rival nationalist theories. Immanuel Kant’s own theory of the state appears to be biased towards the status quo, and therefore has difficulty in explaining what is wrong with rights-respecting colonialism or the annexation of one state by another. Two possible ways forward are explored. One involves making state legitimacy conditional on meeting more stringent standards of distributive justice. The other involves appealing to the idea of a self-determining ‘people’. However the latter must avoid collapsing into either a version of nationalism (if the ‘people’ are identified in cultural terms) or a form of voluntarism (if the ‘people’ are required subjectively to ‘affirm’ the regime that governs them). Thus neo-Kantian theories cannot deliver a plausible account of self-determination without, like Kant himself, tacitly invoking political identities of the kind that they seek to repudiate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
093580
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Abizadeh has argued that because border controls coerce would-be immigrants and invade their autonomy, they are entitled to participate in the democratic institutions that impose those controls. In reply, the author distinguishes between coercion and prevention, shows that prevention need not undermine autonomy, and concludes that although border controls may restrict freedom, they do not give rise to democratic entitlements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|