|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
089818
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper explores the pressures operating on European Union Foreign and Security Policy in the 'triangle of forces' created by the European integration process, developments in the Islamic world and the responses of the United States. In the first section, the paper explores ideas about foreign policy and power in the European Union (EU), as exemplified in debates about the Lisbon Treaty and the future role of the Union. The second part of the paper sets out three logics inherent in the development of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, distinguishing between the 'internal' logic of the European integration process, the 'external' logic reflecting the opportunity structure in the world arena, which creates challenges and opportunities for the EU and its Member States, and the 'identity' logic, which creates a move towards self-realisation and 'self-recognition' on the part of the EU in international politics, and relates this to recent developments in European foreign and security policy. The paper then argues that the multi-dimensional 'triangle of forces' between European integration, the Islamic world and the United States has played a key role in focusing these developments, by posing challenges to the three logics and creating complex linkages between them. The Conclusion asks whether as a result EU foreign policy has been 'catalysed' (given new impetus and direction) or 'constrained' (subject to a process of external or self-limitation), and points to some early indications of the impact of the Obama Administration in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
120540
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article explores the extent to which the European Union (EU) has responded effectively to the rising powers of Asia, Latin America and Africa, and whether the Union has been able to construct an effective diplomacy for dealing with them.
It starts from the observation that the EU has significantly developed its diplomatic apparatus since the Lisbon Treaty, and that this apparatus is largely directed towards the establishment of negotiated order at the regional and global levels. The article identifies a number of tensions and contradictions that arise from the EU's status and role in the global arena and that feed into its quest for negotiated order.
It goes on to assess the challenges to EU positions and strategies that arise not only from the emergence of new powers in the world arena, but also from the changes in global structures and processes that accompany this development.
The article then investigates how these challenges have interacted with the search for negotiated order in a series of issue areas: security, commercial policy, development, environment and energy. It argues that in recent years the EU has, in a variety of ways, been taken outside its comfort zone and that while the European Union can and must seek to re-establish negotiated order in its external relations, the challenge of doing so is severe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
059123
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
014749
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 1992.
|
| Description |
103-120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
145775
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article focuses on the development of the EU’s strategic relationship with China, by exploring the balance amongst three key mechanisms mobilized by the EU: framing, negotiation and management. The article outlines these issues in general, relating them to relevant conceptual and theoretical concerns, and then applies them to the EU–China strategic relationship. Through an examination of the framing ideas embodied in key documents, the development of an EU–China “negotiated order”, and the management of cooperation and competition in sectoral and institutional contexts, the article identifies a number of key tensions and requirements for effective coordination, which affect the potential development of an effective EU strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
129634
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper addresses a key problem in EU-China economic relations: the capacity of the EU to exert leverage through its economic diplomacy in the context of key economic trends, policy dilemmas, and processes of governance. The paper begins by identifying key elements of the EU's economic diplomacy and their relationship to key functions: deliberation, representation, communication, and negotiation. It continues by reviewing key trends and challenges in EU-China economic relations, in terms of trade, finance/investment, and broader issues of economic performance, with special reference to the problems emanating from the current economic turbulence both in the EU and in the broader global political economy. It then identifies a number of key policy dilemmas for the EU in areas such as trade defense/trade promotion, environment/development, security/commercial priorities, nvestment/sovereignty, and explores these in terms of three key concepts: orientation, coordination, and effectiveness. In pursuing this analysis, the paper relates these trends and dilemmas to attempts to govern EU-China economic relations: public/private, bilateral/multilateral, and regulatory/political. In the final section of the paper, these efforts are evaluated in the context of the EU's economic diplomacy, with relation to key actors, processes, and outcomes and to the key functions of deliberation, representation, communication, and negotiation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
098789
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
European Union (EU)-Asia relations raise linked problems (on the one hand) of EU collective action and identity and (on the other hand) of cooperation. The relationship is characterized by complexity and variety in three dimensions: first, 'voices' and history; second, institutional engagement and structure; and third, issue structure. In order to explore the implications of this complexity and variety, and to generate propositions for further research, we deploy International Relations theories based on material interests, ideas and institutions. These help us to demonstrate not only the application of 'analytical theory' but also the role of 'practitioner theory' in the evolution of relations between the EU and Asia, and thus to reflect systematically on the problems of collective action and cooperation identified at the beginning of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
071740
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2006.
|
| Description |
xix, 260p.
|
| Standard Number |
0415390931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 051227 | 341.2422/ELG 051227 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
126627
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The European Union (EU) has a long tradition of involvement in development policy and can claim to be the world's most influential donor when the activities of its member states are aggregated. Recently, however, this position has been challenged by the rise of new donors and models of development assistance, by the changing needs and positions of recipients and by institutional change within the EU itself. This article explores these issues by focusing first on the nature of EU foreign policy, and then on the ways in which it has interacted with the changing trajectory of development policies to create new issues and problems. It concludes that the EU's position remains central and significant to global development policy, but that this position faces important challenges to which the response is as yet uncertain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
064568
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
066995
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
|
| Description |
xxiv, 469p.
|
| Series |
New European Union series
|
| Standard Number |
0199273480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050429 | 327.4/HIL 050429 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
065269
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
3rd ed.
|
| Publication |
Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
|
| Description |
xvii, 326p.
|
| Standard Number |
9781403946119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050041 | 909.83/WHI 050041 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
049895
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Macmillan Press Ltd., 1997.
|
| Description |
xvi, 297p.
|
| Standard Number |
0333676505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039129 | 327.1/WHI 039129 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
037289
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Croom Helm, 1981.
|
| Description |
431p.
|
| Standard Number |
0709923023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 019331 | 327/SMI 019331 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
050026
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Politico's Publishing, 2003.
|
| Description |
vii, 502p.
|
| Standard Number |
1842750046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 047431 | 327.1241/SMI 047431 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
047502
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
2nd ed.
|
| Publication |
London, Channel Four Books, 2000.
|
| Description |
184p.Pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0752271482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 043485 | 940.54/SMI 043485 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
132074
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The authors of this article advocate a new curriculum that can be applied to American government, introduction to political science, and state and local government courses. For the past half-century, high school and college general-education requirements have deemphasized civics, government, and political science. In response to the corresponding decrease in the nation's civic health, this proposal is based on three principles. First, teaching citizenship is different than teaching civics. Second, citizenship is taught most effectively by engagement in the "real world," with students completing projects that take them step by step through the policy-change process. Finally, the education and preparation of future high school government teachers needs to change to encourage them to teach their students the rights, responsibilities, and competencies of active citizenship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
044376
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, George Allen & Unwin (Publihers) Limited, 1984.
|
| Description |
viii, 152p.
|
| Standard Number |
0043270727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 025228 | 327.4073/SMI 025228 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|