| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
188393
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India’s governments since 2011 have rhetorically described a new and ambitious role for the navy as a ‘net security provider’ primarily to island and littoral states of the Indian Ocean. This was primarily based on the navy’s tasks as the ‘first responder’ for maritime disasters and enhanced Maritime Domain Awareness. Yet, the navy preferred instead to be seen in a less expansive role as a ‘provider of net maritime security.’ In late 2020, the navy further adapted this role to become a ‘preferred security partner’ for the littoral and island states of the Indian Ocean. This was essentially the result of budget constraints and capacity shortfalls. But, it also wisely signalled India’s more inclusive and minilateral/multilateral approach towards maritime security cooperation in the aftermath of its border clash with China in June 2020 and China's growing presence, influence and impact in the Indian Ocean region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
052629
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
183263
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India and the United States have recently and rapidly consolidated a significant bilateral defence partnership, have a clear appetite for bilateral and quadrilateral maritime cooperation, and appear to share a common commitment to the rules and norms that govern the maritime domain. Yet the US decision to undertake and publicise a freedom-of-navigation operation targeting India in April 2021 again highlighted the two countries’ divergent interpretations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and of customary international law. This divergence has its origins in differences in Washington’s and New Delhi’s historical engagement with UNCLOS and their preferred means of achieving security and status in the Indo-Pacific. Such differences currently preclude a deep bilateral consensus on maritime order and a common multilateral position within the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
090525
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Mutual trust is in short supply between South Asia's two major rivals, India and Pakistan. The nuclear powers are bitterly divided on host of issues, none more intractable than the future of Kashmir. Yet, as Rahul Roy-Chaudhury explains, their nuclear arsenals have probably helped steer both countries away form all-out conventional war and even led to a haw in bilateral relations. The key to better relations in the future will be how effectively India and Pakistan can co-operate to deter non-state actors form carrying out major terrorist attacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
160147
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Bound by the strategic primacy of the Indian Ocean and by the constraints on its sea-power projection, India's interests sit uneasily with those of the other Quad powers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
001941
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Knowledge world, 2000.
|
| Description |
xxii, 208p.
|
| Standard Number |
8186019294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 043122 | 359.00954/ROY 043122 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 043123 | 359.00954/ROY 043123 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
088517
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Although the broad contours of India's nuclear doctrine were announced within the days of May 1998 nuclear tests, the formal doctrine was made public only five years later. This article will critically examine the evolution of India's nuclear doctrine in terms of the 1999 Kargil conflict and the 2001-2002 military confrontation with Pakistan. This article concludes that the one-page nuclear doctrine of 2003 remains sketchy and subject to varied interpretations. It would therefore be best to formally update or elaborate upon the nuclear doctrine, keeping in view key issues such as India's development of a Ballistic Missile Defence system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
058712
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
005453
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Brassey's, 1995.
|
| Description |
xv, 222p.
|
| Standard Number |
1857530500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036708 | 359.00954/ROY 036708 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 036783 | 359.00954/ROY 036783 | Main | Withdrawn | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
048038
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Brassey's, 1995.
|
| Description |
222p.
|
| Standard Number |
0857530500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 042330 | 359.00954/ROY 042330 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|