| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
110193
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) took part in the World Summit 2005 and agreed to adopt the principle of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). However, there has not been any significant effort to discuss how the R2P might be applicable to the region and the issue remains a marginal one to ASEAN. However, the adoption of the ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) by ASEAN could provide a logical start for the maintraiming of R2P in ASEAN's discourse and practice. Some elements of the APSC appear to have characteristics in common with the R2P principle. While the APSC may provide broad and indirect support for building the capacity of States to recognise, prevent and respond to the situations of conflict, its immediate utility for preventing the four crimes of genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity nonetheless remains to be seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
069937
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
084108
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
084316
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
048351
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 1999.
|
| Description |
xiv, 224p.
|
| Standard Number |
0415205522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 041619 | 327.598051/SUK 041619 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
069694
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
091095
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Indonesia's relations with China began to improve in 1998. This paper argues that recent improvements in bilateral relations have been primarily the function of changes in Indonesia's domestic politics and China's policy toward Southeast Asia, which contributed to the creation of an atmosphere of trust and comfort in Jakarta's re-engagement with China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
092270
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
066209
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
122081
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
129473
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines the United States' pivot strategy in Asia in light of recent developments in the Middle East. More specifically, it discusses the growing perceptions in East Asia about pivoting back" to the Middle East, less than two years after it declared that it would "pivot" to East Asia, The paper dl:~O looks at the strategic implications of regional concerns about America's declining commitment to Fast Asia for the interactional politics of East Asia. It a rogues that while recent events in the Middle East, and America's response, might have heightened East Asia's concerns about America's staying "rug power and the sustainability y of "pivot to ,-'Asia," it is still too early to assume that the "pivot back" to the Middle East would mean that Washington might once again "ignore" East Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|