| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
124566
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Conciliation is an age-old peaceful means of dispute settlement. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea provides for both voluntary and compulsory conciliation. The importance of conciliation under UNCLOS is obvious, yet it has received little focused attention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
080344
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Much of the recent debate among policymakers and in recent scholarship focuses on how states should respond to terrorism: whether they should use harsh policies to punish terrorists and thus deter future acts, or concentrate on root causes and reduce incentives to use terrorism. Often ignored in this discussion are the characteristics that distinguish terrorist groups from one another, and that influence the effectiveness of a state's actions. This article examines group motivation - national-separatism, revolution, reaction, or religion - as one key trait, and finds that these different "terrorisms" do affect the relative success of various counterterrorist policies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
048794
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Abu Dhabi, Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research, 1995.
|
| Description |
44p.
|
| Series |
Emirates Occasional Papers; no. 3
|
| Standard Number |
0863566022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039325 | 355.4/GAR 039325 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 040491 | 355.4/GAR 040491 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
178396
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Since the mid 1990s, growing attention has been given in the scholarly debate and in the public sphere to forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in peacebuilding. These concepts have been reflected upon and highlighted as core components of restoring right relationships and in sustainable peacebuilding: at first focusing mainly on individuals and relations between them and later as well on relations of communities and states in the public sphere. Attempts to better understand forgiveness and reconciliation in relation to peacebuilding have to address also the critical issue of how to safeguard and integrate processes of justice into peace processes. After first clarifying the distinction between retributive and restorative justice, this article considers core findings of Daniel Philpott, John Paul Lederach and Leonel Narvaez in their peacebuilding studies and considers selected, contemporary reconciliation and peace initiatives. The article argues that forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation processes should be further mainstreamed and integrated as part of any standard response to major conflicts and wars by national political bodies, religious communities and religious/secular NGOs, international organisations, agencies and institutions: in order to positively and sustainably resolve and transform conflicts, wars and violence between groups, and to build sustainable peace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|