| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
013033
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1997.
|
| Description |
1303-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
012234
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1997.
|
| Description |
499-501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
057432
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
012233
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1997.
|
| Description |
585-98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
059738
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
169703
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Nepal’s relations with its neighbours are taking a new trajectory. It is coming out of its landlocked status and taking upon itself the role of a bridge between India and China. During his visit to China in June 2018, Prime Minister KP Oli had said “We believe that Nepal can serve as a bridge between our two neighbours. In fact, we want to move from the state of a land-locked to a land-linked country through the development of adequate cross-border connectivity. Our friendship with both our neighbours places us in an advantageous position to realise this goal”.1 Oli’s statement surmises changes in Nepal’s foreign policy with its neighbours in a nutshell. The statement isn’t new on the neighbourhood relationship. In the recent past, previous prime ministers and ambassadors have made similar statements. Gone are the days of special relationship with India or the policy of balancing one against the other. The new emphasis is on connectivity and economic development. By this, Nepal is trying to redefine its foreign policy. In this article the term foreign policy is used in a limited sense of relations with Nepal’s neighbours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
114062
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
What is the efficacy of treaties if one of the signatories has reservations? Nepal, a signatory in the Bilateral Treaty on Peace and Friendship with India, has been raising objections on the Treaty at formal and informal levels. The signatories have agreed to review the Treaty but not much progress has been made on this. Is it because not much thought has gone in the cost-benefit analysis if the Treaty is revised and also no work has been done on the alternatives. To understand the nuances of the discourse on the Treaty, it becomes imperative to understand the discourse on the Treaty amongst the political actors, policy experts, academia in Nepal and the responses of India. What are the issues of divergence and convergence between them? How do they view their own national interests and relations, and how would it impact on the bilateral relations in case the Treaty is revised?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
185779
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Peace and tranquillity in the Himalayas are essential for India’s security and cordial relations with China. This has been a long-standing
understanding of the Indian government and was also stressed and reiterated by the Indian officials during Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s visit to India in March 2022. Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar said that relations between the two countries cannot be normal unless there is total disengagement of forces by China. He reminded China to respect treaties and agreements signed between the two countries on border-related issues.1 A peaceful and stable border is relevant for not only the Indian Himalayas but also for the Himalayan countries having common borders and border-related issues with China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
059675
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
010872
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1996.
|
| Description |
483-492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
058378
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
049017
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Lancer Publishers, 1998.
|
| Description |
xii, 260p.
|
| Standard Number |
1897829442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039887 | 327.5405496/THA 039887 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
049099
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Lancer Publishers & distributors, 1998.
|
| Description |
xii, 260p.
|
| Standard Number |
1897829442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039888 | 327.5405496/THA 039888 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
020676
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
192-201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
072490
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article critically examines the Government of India's policy of 'twin pillars' (constitutional monarchy and multi-party democracy) in Nepal. It asserts that these two forces have not co-existed harmoniously: the inherent contradiction between them is one of the reasons for the political instability in Nepal. Other actors have emerged due to political instability and socio-economic alienation, including protest movements by the janjatis (ethnic nationalities), women, dalits and terains (people from the foothills and plains of Nepal). The Maoist armed movement, by challenging both the monarchy and political parties, has further worsened the situation. This article analyses the strengths and weaknesses of the three main political actors and advocates the adoption of an inclusive political formula for resolving the conflict. Political instability in Nepal has a direct impact upon India, which must therefore proactively use whatever leverage it has in Nepal to help resolve the conflict there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
009568
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1995.
|
| Description |
1193-1206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
140049
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
151880
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
179362
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The dissolution of parliament in Nepal has brought the focus back on its fragile democracy. After years of political instability, a new constitution and one party with absolute majority in the general elections gave the impression and hope that the future looked promising for political stability. But that did not take place. Nepalese politics have remained volatile. The article makes an assessment and suggests the path for India keeping in view Chinese machinations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
010900
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1996.
|
| Description |
531-535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|