| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
052380
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
049344
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, I.B. Tauris, 2002.
|
| Description |
xii, 312p.
|
| Standard Number |
1860648258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 046249 | 303.625/GUR 046249 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
089999
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The development of micro-satellites, including nano-satellites, has opened up opportunities for their varied uses. One such utility is as space mines. The purpose of this instrumentality is protective and defensive to escort important space-mission vehicles. These act as security commandoes till impelled to action by anticipated threat or hostile intruder entering the path. Similarly, conventional land mines can be adapted for use on the surface of the moon. These, also termed "space mines," can serve as proximity or peripheral defense to installations and national assets on the moon and other celestial bodies.
Space mines by their small mass and weight or nature of operation cannot be regarded a weapon of mass destruction or used as nuclear weapon prohibited under the Outer Space Treaty. Secondly, their deployment in passive defensive role does not foul with any substantive provision of space law. Nor are these prohibited by any definitional embargo. Illusioned by the apparent legality, space mines could be strategized in large configurations making outer space environment denser for safe space traffic. Modern satellites are high-cost vehicles and their operational economics cannot brook attrition.
Considering the comparable purpose and role of space mines, one needs to draw wisdom from experience with landmines or cluster bombs. These have been banned on the earth after suffering enormous losses and tragedy. Prudence ordains to learn from past mistakes and it would seem sagacious to nip the evil of space mines in the bud itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
114406
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Do cyber-attacks constitute force? How should international law regulate cyber-activity? How does it affect the principle of non-intervention? In the absence of specific legal principles, can due diligence act as an appropriate framework? In this prize-winning essay, Stephanie Meulenbelt explores the international legal conundrum posed by the rise of cyber-warfare.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|