|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
065227
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
093800
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Barack Obama might yet revolutionize America's foreign policy. But if he can't reconcile his inner Thomas Jefferson with his inner Woodrow Wilson, the 44th president could end up like No.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
085688
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
If it hopes to bring peace to the Middle East, the Obama administration must put Palestinian politics and goals first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
082550
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Atlantic Books, 2007.
|
| Description |
xvii, 449p.
|
| Standard Number |
9781843547242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053647 | 327.73/MEA 053647 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
073508
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Religion has always been a major force in U.S. politics, but the recent surge in the number and the power of evangelicals is recasting the country's political scene -- with dramatic implications for foreign policy. This should not be cause for panic: evangelicals are passionately devoted to justice and improving the world, and eager to reach out across sectarian lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
051838
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
096496
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
151329
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
For the first time in 70 years, the American people have elected [2] a president who disparages [3] the policies, ideas, and institutions at the heart of postwar U.S. foreign policy. No one knows how the foreign policy of the Trump administration will take shape, or how the new president’s priorities and preferences will shift as he encounters the torrent of events and crises ahead. But not since Franklin Roosevelt’s administration has U.S. foreign policy witnessed debates this fundamental.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
081582
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The real key to Washington's pro-Israel policy is long-lasting and broad-based support for the Jewish state among the American public at large.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
054263
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 2004.
|
| Description |
viii, 226p.
|
| Standard Number |
1400042372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 048740 | 327.73/MEA 048740 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
130469
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
So far, the year 2014 has been a tumultuous one, as geopolitical rivalries have stormed back to center stage. Whether it is Russian forces seizing Crimea, China making aggressive claims in its coastal waters, Japan responding with an increasingly assertive strategy of its own, or Iran trying to use its alliances with Syria and Hezbollah to dominate the Middle East, old-fashioned power plays are back in international relations. The United States and the EU, at least, find such trends disturbing. Both would rather move past geopolitical questions of territory and military power and focus instead on ones of world order and global governance: trade liberalization, nuclear nonproliferation, human rights, the rule of law, climate change, and so on. Indeed, since the end of the Cold War, the most important objective of U.S. and EU foreign policy has been to shift international relations away from zero-sum issues toward win-win ones. To be dragged back into old-school contests such as that in Ukraine doesn't just divert time and energy away from those important questions; it also changes the character of international politics. As the atmosphere turns dark, the task of promoting and maintaining world order grows more daunting. But Westerners should never have expected old-fashioned geopolitics to go away. They did so only because they fundamentally misread what the collapse of the Soviet Union meant: the ideological triumph of liberal capitalist democracy over communism, not the obsolescence of hard power. China, Iran, and Russia never bought into the geopolitical settlement that followed the Cold War, and they are making increasingly forceful attempts to overturn it. That process will not be peaceful, and whether or not the revisionists succeed, their efforts have already shaken the balance of power and changed the dynamics of international politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
049763
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Century Foundation Book, 2001.
|
| Description |
xviii, 374p.
|
| Standard Number |
0375412301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 046689 | 327.73/MEA 046689 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
101895
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
What does rise of the Tea Party movement mean for U.S. foreign policy? Since today's populists have little interest in creating a liberal world order, U.S. policymakers will have to find some way to satisfy their angry domestic constituencies while also working effectively in the international arena.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|