|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
050308
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
|
| Description |
xvi, 483p.
|
| Series |
Contemporary political theory
|
| Standard Number |
0521534313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 047531 | 321.8/MAC 047531 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
085895
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Schumpeter's redefinition of representative democracy as merely leadership competition was canonical in postwar political science. Schumpeter denies that individual will, common will, or common good are essential to democracy, but he, and anyone, I contend, is forced to assume these conditions in the course of denying them. Democracy is only a method, of no intrinsic value, its sole function to select leaders, according to Schumpeter. Leaders impose their views, and are not controlled by voters, and this is as it should be, he says. I respond that his leadership democracy is implausible, both descriptively and prescriptively. Competitive election is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition of democracy, not sufficient even for the limited empirical purpose of regime classification. Any adequate definition of democracy must make reference to the common will, the common good, and other values, I submit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|