Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
121587
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The substantial literature on mass violence, from ethnic cleansing to civil wars, has paid surprisingly little attention to the largest instance of mass violence in human history: the Holocaust. When political scientists have approached the subject, the trend has been to treat the Holocaust as a single case, comparing it-sometimes controversially-with other instances of genocide such as Rwanda or Cambodia. But historically grounded work on the destruction of European Jewry can help illuminate the microfoundations of violent politics, unpack the relationship between a ubiquitous violence-inducing ideology (antisemitism) and highly variable murder, and recast old questions about the origins and evolution of the Holocaust itself. After reviewing new trends in history-writing, I highlight opportunities for social-scientifically oriented research centered on the interaction of state power, local communities, and violent mobilization in five areas: military occupation, repertoires of violence, alliance politics, genocidal policymaking, and resistance. My conclusion addresses thorny issues of comparison, morality, and memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
179498
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
057996
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
116603
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In almost every region of the globe, there is a phantom state hovering like an apparition among the more corporeal members of the international system. Some of their names sound like the warring kingdoms of a fantasy novel: Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh and the Dniester Moldovan Republic. Others, such as Gaza/Palestine, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, or Taiwan, dominate the headlines. These polities look like real countries to their inhabitants, who salute their flags and vote in their elections. Some even field armies, issue visas, and collect taxes. But they are largely invisible to international legal institutions, multilateral organizations, and global trade regimes. The reason is that they lack formal recognition, or what a political scientist would call "external sovereignty."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
019450
|
|
|
Publication |
2001.
|
Description |
p49-68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
096486
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
050454
|
|
|
Publication |
Mar-Apr 2004.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Georgia's recent, peaceful revolutions might allow the country to become a beacon of hope for a troubled region. For that to happen, however, its new leaders must find a way to deal with local secessionists, as well as with Moscow and Washington
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
114127
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
As a referendum on Scotland's independence looms, the question of the region's place in the United Kingdom has become the most pressing issue in British politics. Its experience shows how a smart secessionist party can dismantle a functioning country, and how central governments eager to buy off regions can end up making matters worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|