| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
146909
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The word ‘doctrine’ has been part of military terminology for more than 100 years. Even though the word is ubiquitous in modern military literature, it is still ambiguous and tends to put very different ideas into readers’ mind. In order to make the concept less vague and thus more useful, this paper explores the historical and pragmatic origin of the concept, and points out some of its potential pitfalls. The main message of the article is that, although it can be extremely hard to make a viable doctrine, it is worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
051227
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Frank Cass, 2003.
|
| Description |
xiv, 146p.
|
| Standard Number |
0714654906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 048229 | 355.33041/HOI 048229 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
108713
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Doctrine' has been part of military vernacular for at least a century. Nonetheless, it is a concept which is rather under-explored. The aim of this article is thus to break doctrine down into its component parts in order to grasp what a military doctrine actually is. Thereafter, the article points out different ways to utilise doctrine as a military devise. A doctrine cannot be, or rather should not be, all things to all men. On the contrary, doctrine can be a tool of command, tool of education or a tool of change. The main upshot of the article is that the future of doctrine is far brighter than its critics want us to believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|