| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
148527
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines the evidences used by the Tribunal for the South China Sea Arbitration to conclude that Philippines’ Submissions 3-4 and 6-7 reflect disputes. The Jurisdictional Award uses certain notes verbales sent by the Philippines and China in April 2011 for this purpose. However, the plain wording of these notes verbales negates the existence of disputes concerning the legal status of nine maritime features identified by those four Submissions. The Tribunal overlooks the agreement reached in these notes verbales that some geological features in the Kalayaan Islands Group may generate Exclusive Economic Zone and continental shelf, which serve to defeat Philippines’ Submissions 5, 8, and 9 as well as the Philippines’ theory that China invokes historical rights to justify its law enforcement activities in the entire region within the U-Shaped Line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
170841
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
143373
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, United Nations Publications, 1981.
|
| Description |
v, 172p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024689 | 355.825119/UNI 024689 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
070035
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
004845
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, United Nations, 1994.
|
| Description |
xv,118p.
|
| Series |
Disarmament Study Series; no.27
|
| Standard Number |
9211422051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 035878 | 355.033/UNI 035878 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 036034 | 355.033/UNI 036034 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
123501
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Failure to recognise or acknowledge and respond to local cultural manifestations of Indigenous peoples' attempts to maintain or reassert themselves in spaces of intercultural engagement in resource management denies the power of their own cultural foundations and principles. This paper reviews experience of informal negotiations at the Argyle Diamond Mine in Western Australia. It argues that giving careful consideration to specific cultural practices and processes associated with place and the social relations these practices engender facilitates development of transforming practices that change outcomes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
171245
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The EU is vigorously pursuing Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) in its trade and aid relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. Justifying the EPAs as being ‘development friendly’, EU officials promise that aid support to private sector development (PSD) in ACP countries will make free trade systems ‘win–win’. This article, based on the authors’ semi-structured interviews conducted in Ghana and Nigeria, examines the perspectives of cocoa stakeholders vis-à-vis EPAs and PSD. Applying critical discourse analysis to interview transcripts, it underscores areas of overlap and, crucially, divergence among cocoa stakeholders’ own narratives on PSD support in the context of EPAs and the official legitimating discourse of EU institutions. In the process, the article draws critical attention to cocoa business interviewees’ concerns regarding the impact of premature trade liberalisation. It also underscores cocoa stakeholders’ concerns that EU PSD promises are not being fulfilled in terms of actual tangible benefits for business people in this vital ACP export sector. Accordingly, the article contributes to, and corroborates, an existing critical scholarly literature which problematises the strategic functions of donor PSD discourse in presenting free trade reforms as being ‘pro-poor’ in the post-Washington Consensus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|