| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
073744
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
109542
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
123751
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Niyogi Books, 2014.
|
| Description |
140p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789381523858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057448 | 954.915/MAR 057448 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
051452
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
072305
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
074449
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
074452
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
117909
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Pakistan is one of the most complex multi-ethnic societies in the developing Islamic world. Each of the ethnic groups that now comprise Pakistan has very distinctive identity, folklore, history and political interests. However, Pakistan's nation builders were not alive to the ethnic question and failed to integrate ethnic groups into a Pakistani nationhood through recognised principles of autonomy, representation and empowerment. Instead, a non-representative, military-led authoritarian system suppressed legitimate regional and ethnic aspirations, relying too heavily on Islam and Pakistan ideology (two nation theory) to forge a sense of common nationhood. It didn't work: since the 1950s there have been four major insurrections against the central government by Baluch nationalists. Although the Baluch national question has its roots in the colonial era, it emerged as a significant political and security issue because an over-centralised and non-representative power system couldn't address the issue of ethnic diversity. Baluchistan is now a hub of interests for regional and major powers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
074450
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
103559
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
110999
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
100119
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
075610
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Persian territorial designs in Baluchistan clashed with British interest to construct an Indo-European telegraph line through the Makran Coast, where Britain had close local allies in dispute with Persia. The British prime interest being the speedy construction of the line, they decided on bypassing these disputed territories by connecting Bushehr, through submarine cable, with Gwadar-which they believed, contrary to the Persians, to be non-Persian. The Persian government protested against the British infringement of her sovereign rights, adopting both diplomatic and military approaches. This forced the British government to check the legality of the Persian claims. But the arbitrary was neither neutral nor fair, with Britain opposing the suzerainty of Persia over the chiefs of western Makran, while acknowledging the right of conquest by others elsewhere on the coast. This was in line with British policy of favoring governments bordering British India over Persia. Although unable to change the arbitrary, the Persian government still managed, in spite of her military weakness, to drag the British government into a hard bargain and tough negotiations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
072485
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Qajar irredentism brought Persia to make some advances in Baluchistan in the 1830s and 1840s, but in early 1860s, the continuation of this advance was threatened by one of Britain's main imperial interests and needs: the Indo-European telegraph line, which was to cross the Makran Coast overland. Persia sought to use this need for getting British recognition for its claims over Baluchistan. This put the British under pressure, for they did not wish to alienate Persia, through whose territories the line was to pass. The British government tried to appease the Persians with a simple declaration that the telegraph would not affect their claims and by taking the telegraph away from disputed territories. One major thing was faulty in this "solution," for it was the British who decided which territories were "disputed" or "undisputed," not the Persians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
072352
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
074451
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
039062
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Cassell and Company Ltd, 1968.
|
| Description |
x, 306p.: ill., mapshbk
|
| Standard Number |
304931586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 001394 | 954.35/ELL 001394 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
148108
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s remarks on Baluchistan marks a paradigm shift in India’s foreign policy. Our foreign policy has now become proactive and pragmatic. The present paper wishes to explore its impact on relations between India and Pakistan. It will also tend to analyze these developments in the light of spirit of SAARC. What can be the ways for bringing peace and prosperity in SAARC region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
135103
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Asian educational services, 1996.
|
| Description |
x, 402p., mapHbk
|
| Contents |
Contains map, Old Publication
|
| Standard Number |
8120611853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057988 | 958.103/HOL 057988 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
027760
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Essex, Longman Group Limited, 1983.
|
| Description |
xx, 268p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
0582783402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024345 | 954.91/OSB 024345 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|