| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
087887
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper aims at exploring ways of resolving the India-Pakistan conflict the conflict transformation approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
051514
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India and Pakistan have agreed to a ' comprehensive dialogue' on a range of problems, including Kashmir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
133605
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
It is relevant to recall the background to Pakistan's move to introduce this resolution. India was in a very difficult situation at the time. Kashmir was in flames due to a strong militant movement aided and abetted by Pakistan. Confrontation between the security forces and militants was an all too frequent occurrence. Moreover, India was far from being a rising power as is the case today. It had a minority government fighting for survival, hard put to address a myriad of serious problems like the demolition of the Babri Masjid and the subsequent Mumbai riots with an economy on the brink of bankruptcy. You would remember that a couple of years earlier, we had to mortgage gold to keep our economy afloat and India's diplomatic standing was, perhaps, at its lowest ever at that point in time. With hindsight, it is obvious that Pakistan had orchestrated its move to mount a resolution against us on Kashmir in tandem with its promotion of militancy there, so as to internationalise the issue and push us to the corner at a time when we were at our weakest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
129948
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
080783
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The theme of this paper is to review the extent to which, in the post-9/11 environment, it became difficult for Pakistan to continue its covert support of the Kashmiri separatist movement at the same time as assisting the United States and its allies in the global 'War on Terror'. The paper will explain the origins of Pakistan's support and also examine the potential that the dispute between India and Pakistan over the state of Jammu and Kashmir still has to act as a de-stabilising factor in Pakistan and the region. The argument is that the Kashmir issue no longer has the same explosive characteristics it had 20 years or even 10 years ago, and that a genuine attempt has been made by the Pakistan government to curtail cross-border terrorism-although it has not been entirely successful, mainly because the militant groups have succeeded in establishing a momentum of their own. Yet, even after 60 years, there remains a general reluctance to let go of the Kashmir issue without some tangible political gain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|