| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
057510
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
073054
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Various conditions have facilitated Europe's rise as a 'hub' of global jihad, especially the presence of a nucleus of foreign Islamist activists, a large pool of potential recruits, and the freedom to operate with few, if any, restrictions. The Iraq war has prompted a revival of the jihadist network in Europe. In response, European policymakers need legal reforms, increased institutional cooperation and sustained efforts to engage with European Muslim communities. The threat is both urgent and profound, and it will be necessary to embark on considered long-term strategies which may require European leaders to re-examine some of the tacit arrangements that have allowed European societies to enjoy an unparalleled degree of domestic freedom, peace and prosperity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
060698
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
085742
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, IISS, 2008.
|
| Description |
71p.
|
| Series |
Adelphi Paper, 399
|
| Standard Number |
9780415547314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 054087 | 363.325094/NEU 054087 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
061683
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
056343
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
077032
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Although many governments say that they will not negotiate with terrorists, in practice they often do. And their rhetoric has prevented the systematic analysis of how to do so best. The goal should be to buttress moderates among the terrorists without strengthening hard-liners -- by promising legitimate political involvement, but only if the terrorists eschew violence and accept democratic principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
120929
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The purpose of this article is to inform the debate about strategies and options for countering online radicalization within the U.S. domestic context. Its aim is to provide a better understanding of how the Internet facilitates radicalization; an appreciation of the dilemmas and tradeoffs that are involved in countering online radicalization within the United States; and ideas and best practices for making the emerging approach and strategy richer and more effective. It argues that online radicalization can be dealt with in three ways. Approaches aimed at restricting freedom of speech and removing content from the Internet are not only the least desirable, they are also the least effective. Instead, government should play a more energetic role in reducing the demand for radicalization and violent extremist messages-for example, by encouraging civic challenges to extremist narratives and by promoting awareness and education of young people. In the short term, the most promising way for dealing with the presence of violent extremists and their propaganda on the Internet is to exploit their online communications to gain intelligence and gather evidence in the most comprehensive and systematic fashion possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
149287
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, I B Tauris, 2016.
|
| Description |
xviii, 235p.: ill., mapspbk
|
| Standard Number |
9781784536732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058901 | 303.484/NEU 058901 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
081151
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2008.
|
| Description |
ix,126p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780415426183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053262 | 363.325/NEU 053262 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
123983
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Though widely used by academics and policy-makers in the context of the 'war on terror', the concept of radicalization lacks clarity. This article shows that while radicalization is not a myth, its meaning is ambiguous and the major controversies and debates that have sprung from it are linked to the same inherent ambiguity.
The principal conceptual fault-line is between notions of radicalization that emphasize extremist beliefs ('cognitive radicalization') and those that focus on extremist behavior ('behavioural radicalization'). This ambiguity explains the differences between definitions of radicalization; it has driven the scholarly debate, which has revolved around the relationship between cognition and behavior; and it provides the backdrop for strikingly different policy approaches - loosely labeled 'European' and 'Anglo-Saxon' - which the article delineates and discusses in depth.
Rather than denying its validity, the article calls on scholars and policy-makers to work harder to understand and embrace a concept which, though ambiguous, is likely to dominate research and policy agendas for years to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
051931
|
|
|