| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
076239
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, University of Washington Press, 2006.
|
| Description |
xii, 399p.
|
| Standard Number |
029598631X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052329 | 327.51055/GAR 052329 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
052069
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China has at least six distinct policies toward Kashmir. There is China's formal, declaratory position on the issue. There are Chinese demonstrations of support for Pakistan's security during periods of India-Pakistan confrontation over Kashmir. There is Chinese support for Pakistan's military and industrial development efforts regardless of India-Pakistan tension over Kashmir. There is Beijing's stance regarding the modalities for solving the Kashmir issue. Finally, Beijing uses Kashmir as diplomatic leverage with Washington and New Delhi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
071286
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
114503
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The author argues that U.S. interest in Asia traditionally has been maintaining the balance of power to prevent the rise of any regional hegemony. Yet against this anti-hegemony objective is balanced an attempt to accommodate China. If China keeps this commitment, the United States will welcome the emergence of a China that is peaceful and prosperous and that cooperates with America to address common challenges and mutual interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
055564
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
052508
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article reviews several recent books, including the recently declassified Indian official history of the 1962 war, and analyzes the possible role of India complicity with US covert operations in Tibet as a factor in the origin of the 1962 Sino-Indian war. The Indian official history of the 1962 war offers little useful information in this regard, while other scholarly studies are reckless in their assertions of Indian complicity. We still remain in the dark about what Nehru knew and when he knew it about CIA activities in Tibet. The best guess seems to be that Nehru had a broad, general knowledge of US covert activities, recognized as useful for pressing China to compromise with India over Tibet, but refused to associate India in any way with US activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
102965
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
051689
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Seattle, University of Washington Press, 2001.
|
| Description |
xiv, 447p.
|
| Standard Number |
0295980737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 044613 | 327.51054/GAR 044613 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
048587
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Armonk, M. E. Sharpe, 1997.
|
| Description |
xiii, 312p.
|
| Standard Number |
0765600250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 040294 | 327.73051249/GAR 040294 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|