Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
052499
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
089332
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The development of new energy export infrastructure, which bypasses Russia, has constituted a fundamental element of US and European engagement with the Caucasus in recent years, but has, to some extent, undermined Moscow's hegemony in an area that it considers to be its own 'strategic backyard'. This article examines the validity of the argument that Russian military intervention in Georgia in August 2008 was motivated by so-called 'petro-politics' and a desire to punish Tbilisi for its overt pro-Western orientation. It analyses the significance of the pipelines that transit Georgia and their implications for European energy security, together with the potential consequences of the 2008 conflict for future infrastructure developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
051032
|
|
|
Publication |
London, routledgeCurzon, 2003.
|
Description |
ix, 246p.: tables, mapshbk
|
Standard Number |
0415297206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
047980 | 947.52/GER 047980 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
080526
|
|
|
Publication |
2007.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This essay examines growing European Union (EU) involvement in the South Caucasus, focusing on efforts to resolve the protracted conflicts in the regions of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh. To date, the EU has occupied a back seat in conflict resolution efforts, supporting organisations such as the UN and OSCE, which have taken the lead role. However, over a decade of negotiations has produced few tangible results and the EU now has the opportunity to play a much greater role. This essay argues that the EU needs to become more involved: it has a much wider range of tools at its disposal with which to influence the various situations and it is in its own interest to ensure the stability of its neighbours
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|