Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
133745
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Jacob Talmon and Arnold Toynbee were among the 20 most influential historians of the twentieth century in a list published by the Dutch journal Intermediair in May 1980. But this is not the only common denominator between them: both faced strong opposition at home - Toynbee was ridiculed and Talmon was considered a 'self-hating Jew'. Following the generally accepted definition that an intellectual is one who attempts to shape history while it is still in progress, they both tried to shape developments in the Arab-Israeli conflict and to ameliorate its consequences. They failed, but their insights and suggestions are still valid today. They differed deeply with regard to major aspects of the Middle East conflict, in particular the right of the Jewish people to statehood. Following the 1967 Six Day War, they corresponded and discussed the Middle East conflict. The article focuses on this correspondence and quotes from their private papers, books and articles over the last 70 years, and from other sources. Sadly, not much has changed in the Arab-Israeli conflict. 'That which has been, it is that which shall be; and that which has been done is that which shall be done; and there is nothing new under the sun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
019545
|
|
|
Publication |
2001.
|
Description |
49-103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
021981
|
|
|
Publication |
April 2002.
|
Description |
58-70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
144673
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Various factors shape European and Muslim migrant relations; one of these is European‒Jewish and European‒Israeli precedents. Hitherto, this factor has not been thoroughly discussed. This article focuses on the use of recent and past histories, by all sides, when describing present and future relations between the European majority and Muslim migrant minority. This discourse often makes reference to European Jewry as a guiding precedent, as well as to Israeli Middle Eastern policies. As a result, a meaningful triangle has been formed, whose sides consist of Europeans, Muslim immigrants and Jewish communities. The shared issues between them include the painful record of European‒Jewish relations and its implications for the European‒Muslim encounter; the Holocaust; the European Right, its agendas concerning Jews, Muslim immigration and its surprising contacts with the State of Israel; European restrictions against Muslim and Jewish worship and religious rites; among others. Repeatedly, the Muslim issue in Europe is referred to as the Continent’s ‘new Jewish problem’. Moreover, the contemporary integration experience of Muslim migrants in Europe is compared to that of Jews in earlier ages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
000410
|
|
|
Publication |
Ramat Gan, Bar-Ilan University Press, 1999.
|
Description |
50p.
|
Series |
Security and Policy Studies; 42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
041679 | 327.561056/NAC 041679 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
052874
|
|
|
Publication |
Israel, Bar - Ilan University, 1997.
|
Description |
93p.
|
Series |
Security and policy studies;32
|
Contents |
Reprinted with permission from studies in conflict and terrorism Vol.20, no.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
038929 | 333.9100956/NAC 038929 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
053114
|
|
|
Publication |
Jan-March 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|