| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
020742
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
451-466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
065415
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
076948
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article argues that a major factor in terrorist acts is an appeal to the actor's own community at an emotional and symbolic level, through acts of sacrifice, particularly self-sacrifice. Although other aims also exist, a prime concern is to recall the actor's home audience to the struggle, because the actor regards himself as acting on their behalf. This utilizes the imagery and symbolism of traditional religion, implying a strong communal and non-material impetus to terrorist acts, rather than rational material calculation, that modern Western man finds difficult to comprehend. It also recalls much classical social theory, which emphasized the central role of religion in community. Self-sacrifice tells an emotional story to the actor's community that is comprehensible to them and will have an emotional appeal to maintaining the community. For the Northern Ireland hunger strikes (possibly analogous to suicide bombers) this is reflected in their appeal solely to a Catholic/nationalist community that equates strongly with ideas of a pre-modern society under threat from a modernizing society. All the hunger strikers were very normal for their community, but left non-Catholics completely unmoved. Consequently there is a need to understand the communal dynamics behind terrorism if one is to effectively counter the threat and that different societies may have different values regarding the individual, community, and life itself. Individual motivations do not provide an adequate explanation for much terrorism and it is a failure to grasp this that severely hinders much counterterrorism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
023128
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
42-79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
023166
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
357-382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
158961
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Radicalism or radicalisation has become a serious political and academic theme in recent years and any incident involving Muslims now almost automatically acquires the cachet, as events in 2016 and 2017 have shown. However, despite vast sums and resources expended on the subject no one can define what they mean by ‘it’. This should make us pause and question what precisely it is that causes so much alarm and is it worth the resources, time and effort employed to respond to it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
108180
|
|
|