| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
013514
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov/Dec 1997.
|
| Description |
23-44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
135189
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oslo, Peace Research Institute Oslo, 2013.
|
| Description |
83p.Pbk
|
| Series |
PRIO Paper
|
| Contents |
In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA)
|
| Standard Number |
9788272885259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058019 | 327.581/PAT 058019 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 058020 | 327.581/PAT 058020 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
086244
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The ascendancy of Jamaat Islami to power in a country that was born on the basis of secularism indicates the changing political dynamics in Bangladesh. Its syncretic tradition rooted in its language and culture limited Jamaat's success. Nevertheless, given the role the party played during the liberation war, its political ascendancy speaks of the changing political landscape. This article argues that though the party has exhibited some political success, it faces challenges from the secularists in the socio-cultural sphere, thereby limiting its growth and expansion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
136782
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
‘Continuity’ has been a part of India’s foreign policy and a change in government can only bring in certain nuances in the conduct of that policy. The political environment that a new government brings in certainly creates some expectation from the government, but, any change in the foreign policy would be contingent upon a change in the strategic environment in which a state functions. Yet, the BJP led NDA government’s policy is keenly watched and there is an expectation that this government’s foreign policy would be different in style and direction, if not in substance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
074162
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
091984
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The mutiny by Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) shortly after Bangladesh Awami League (AL) took office in January 2009 jolted the nation which was celebrating a transition to democracy after a two-year rule by the military backed caretaker government headed by Dr Fakhruddin Ahmed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
051964
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jul-Dec 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
007216
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2000.
|
| Description |
1189-1194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
006983
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2000.
|
| Description |
939-970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
059700
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
177776
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The COVID-19 pandemic placed enormous stress on the fledgling health infrastructure in the South Asian region. The economic distress compounded the problem as many business houses closed down and people working in the informal sector lost their jobs. The governments in the region, except in Pakistan, went for a complete lockdown to contain the spread of the pandemic. India which prides itself as the ‘Pharmacy of the world’ geared up to provide humanitarian assistance by supplying essential medicines, ventilators and providing rapid-action teams consisting of medical professionals to assist its neighbours as a first responder. It also supplied vaccines to the immediate neighbourhood once they were ready. India’s health diplomacy enhanced its soft-power projection and helped it project itself as a country that is concerned about its neighbours—a major shift in its regional diplomacy, compared to the Cold War period. This article maps India’s regional diplomacy in the historical context and analyses the making of India’s regional diplomacy in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
111282
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article argues that India does not have a well-defined neighbourhood policy. It makes a historical survey of the approaches of different Indian leaders to the neighbourhood and examines the reasons for the prevailing negative perceptions about India in the region. It argues that these negative perceptions have come about because India has largely adopted an ad hoc and bilateral approach vis-Ã -vis its neighbours and has allowed its policy to be guided by an overarching concern for security. In recent years, India's approach has changed considerably. However, it needs clearer articulation. The article suggests that India must effectively communicate its vision of regional integration to its neighbours, enable them to participate profitably in its growing economy, spell out its 'non-negotiables' in matters concerning its security and national interest, maintain linkages at the highest political level, open multiple tracks of communication and take a leadership position in multilateral forums like SAARC and BIMSTEC to bring peace and prosperity to the region through greater cooperation in diverse areas. This will prove effective in improving its relations with its neighbours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
058421
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Manohar Publishers, 2004.
|
| Description |
189p.
|
| Series |
RCSS policy studies; no.26
|
| Standard Number |
8173045771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 049053 | 327.5405491/PAT 049053 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
167853
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Bangladesh and India and the resolution of some of the long pending issues have removed some earlier distrust, greatly institutionalizing the relationship between the two. India opposes the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), while Bangladesh is a participant. China shares a robust relationship with the military of Bangladesh, while security cooperation between India and Bangladesh is nascent, involving capacity building and cooperation to meet non-traditional security challenges. Bangladesh has kept the sensitivities of the two countries in mind as it engages with both. Therefore, it has built its energy and infrastructure with the largest credit line ever offered by India while also engaging with China to invest massively in infrastructure projects. Bangladesh is the only country in South Asia to have profited from relations with both India and China in such a way. In this study, four sectors have been selected in which Bangladesh has engaged both countries and benefitted immeasurably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
021266
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct-Dec 2001.
|
| Description |
41-66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
058338
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
059581
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
127467
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The politics of coalition has posed new challenges to India's foreign policy. This problem becomes particularly evident in India's neighbourhood, which inevitably becomes intertwined with domestic politics. The rise of regional political parties and their role as coalition partners makes it more difficult for the union government to ignore provincial sentiments. Competitive politics featuring both national and regional political parties provides primacy to local interest as this is linked to the vote bank politics. Given the fact that coalition politics has become a reality, this article analyses how to engage the states and make them stakeholders in furthering India's neighbourhood policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
112215
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, IDSA, 2012.
|
| Description |
292p.
|
| Standard Number |
9788121211666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 056515 | 327.54095492/PAT 056515 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 056516 | 327.54095492/PAT 056516 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
019272
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
411-436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|